• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术专长的集中是否能改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果?9 年审核周期。

Does concentration of surgical expertise improve outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? 9 year audit cycle.

机构信息

Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, Devon EX2 5DW, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2013 Dec;11(6):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2013.06.005
PMID:23916664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence from surgery shows that high volume is often associated with better outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate this principle related to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy practice.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all conversions and complications for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Data was collected and then repeated after restrictions were implemented to concentrate practice. Hospital databases and patient notes were used to collect data.

RESULTS

Between January 1999 and March 2004, 1605 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed by 8 surgeons. Case load varied from an average of <1 to 104 procedures per annum. Only 1 surgeon was an upper gastrointestinal specialist. Overall rates for conversion to open surgery were 4.9%, common bile duct injury was 0.31%, bile leak 0.75%, bowel injury 0.25%, haemorrhage 0.44% and death 0.06%, which met guidelines. Significant correlation between conversion and procedure number was identified (p=0.033) Between April 2006 and March 2010, 1820 laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed by 4 surgeons. Case load varied from 23 to 268 procedures per annum, 2 surgeons were upper gastrointestinal specialists. Overall rates for conversion to open surgery were 3.5%, common bile duct injury 0.1%, bile leak 0.9%, bowel injury 0.21%, haemorrhage 0.16% and death 0.1%. Conversion rates were significantly lower in re-audit data (p=0.027), but remained lowest for the highest volume sub-specialist surgeons (p=0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Concentrating expertise to those surgeons with interest and commitment to laparoscopic cholecystectomy service led to standardisation and reduction in conversion rates. There is correlation between volume of surgery and outcomes.

摘要

背景

手术证据表明,高容量通常与更好的结果相关。本研究旨在调查与选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术实践相关的这一原则。

方法

对所有接受选择性腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的中转和并发症进行回顾性分析。收集数据后,实施限制措施集中实践,然后再次收集数据。使用医院数据库和患者记录收集数据。

结果

1999 年 1 月至 2004 年 3 月,8 名外科医生进行了 1605 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。病例量平均每年<1 至 104 例不等。只有 1 名外科医生是上消化道专家。中转开腹手术的总体比率为 4.9%,胆总管损伤率为 0.31%,胆漏率为 0.75%,肠损伤率为 0.25%,出血率为 0.44%,死亡率为 0.06%,符合指南。发现中转与手术数量之间存在显著相关性(p=0.033)。2006 年 4 月至 2010 年 3 月,4 名外科医生进行了 1820 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术。病例量每年从 23 例到 268 例不等,其中 2 名外科医生是上消化道专家。中转开腹手术的总体比率为 3.5%,胆总管损伤率为 0.1%,胆漏率为 0.9%,肠损伤率为 0.21%,出血率为 0.16%,死亡率为 0.1%。再次审核数据中转率显著降低(p=0.027),但最高容量亚专科医生的中转率最低(p=0.016)。

结论

将专业知识集中到对腹腔镜胆囊切除术服务有兴趣和承诺的外科医生手中,导致了标准化和降低了转化率。手术量与结果之间存在相关性。

相似文献

1
Does concentration of surgical expertise improve outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? 9 year audit cycle.手术专长的集中是否能改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果?9 年审核周期。
Surgeon. 2013 Dec;11(6):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Is Specialisation Needed in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 5122 Patients.是否需要在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中进行专业化?一项对 5122 名患者的回顾性队列研究。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020 Nov-Dec;115(6):756-766. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.6.756.
3
Complications of daytime elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by surgeons who operated the night before.前夜手术的外科医生日间择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的并发症。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 6;310(17):1837-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280372.
4
Travelling surgeons--a clinical audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures in Northland, New Zealand.巡回外科医生——新西兰北地地区腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床审计
N Z Med J. 2009 Oct 30;122(1305):34-40.
5
Protocol for a multicentre, prospective, population-based cohort study of variation in practice of cholecystectomy and surgical outcomes (The CholeS study).多中心、前瞻性、基于人群的胆囊切除术实践变异性和手术结果的队列研究方案(CholeS 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 12;5(1):e006399. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006399.
6
Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center clinical analysis.门诊与住院腹腔镜胆囊切除术:单中心临床分析。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010 Feb;9(1):60-4.
7
[Analysis of complications and clinical and pathologic factors in relation to the laparoscopic cholecystectomy].[腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关并发症及临床病理因素分析]
Rozhl Chir. 2014 Mar;93(3):123-31.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of our training programme.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我们培训计划的一次审核
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Apr;75(4):231-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03370.x.
9
Who should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A 10-year audit.谁应该进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术?一项为期10年的审计。
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1492-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9291-z. Epub 2007 May 5.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.不结扎胆囊管和胆囊动脉的超声刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.2020 年世界急诊外科学会更新了急性结石性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00336-x.
2
Effects of the concentration of digestive surgical operations in regional Japan.日本地区消化外科手术集中度的影响。
Surg Today. 2018 Apr;48(4):416-421. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1601-z. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
3
Biliary cirrhosis and sepsis are two risk factors of failure after surgical repair of major bile duct injury post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
胆汁性肝硬化和脓毒症是腹腔镜胆囊切除术后主要胆管损伤手术修复失败的两个危险因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jun;399(5):601-8. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1205-7. Epub 2014 May 6.