• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否需要在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中进行专业化?一项对 5122 名患者的回顾性队列研究。

Is Specialisation Needed in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 5122 Patients.

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020 Nov-Dec;115(6):756-766. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.6.756.

DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.115.6.756
PMID:33378634
Abstract

Gallstone disease is a common problem and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common elective procedure. This operation was performed by a general surgeon, colorectal surgeons, breast and vascular surgeons according to the largest UK's audit (CholeS study). Objectives: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a specialist upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeon to that of CholeS and large international studies. Our hypothesis is: UGI specialist is producing better outcomes for LC patients. All patient who underwent LC between 1999 and 2019 at one hospital by an UGI consultant and 2014-2019 at another hospital by another UGI consultant surgeon were included. The inclusion criteria were LC performed by UGI surgeon. Lost to follow up, procedures done by trainees and gallbladder cancer patients were excluded. The outcome measures of bile leak, bile duct injuries, bleeding, infectious complications, bowel injuries, vascular injuries and pseudoaneurysms, neuralgia, port site hernia, mesenteric haematoma, 30-day mortality and conversion to open were reported. Statistical tests were used to assess the significant differences, the confidence interval was 95% and the p-value was taken as 0.05. Two UGI specialists performed 5122 LC, 4396 (86%) were female and 715 (14%) male. The age was 13-93 year (median of 48 years). 3681 (72 %) was done as a day surgery case. 1431(28%) as an inpatient and 287 (5.6%) emergency LC. There was no death in the 30 days periods of surgery, 8 (0.15%) biliary leak from the duct of Luschka, 4 (0.19%) common bile duct (CBD) injuries, 9(0.02%) conversions and 17(0.33%) procedures were abandoned. There were significant differences in the above complications between our study and the CholeS report. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with acceptable outcomes, low risk of bile duct injury and no mortality when performed by a specialist upper GI surgeon.

摘要

胆囊疾病是一种常见的问题,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是一种常见的择期手术。这项手术由普通外科医生、结直肠外科医生、乳腺和血管外科医生根据英国最大的审计(CholeS 研究)进行操作。目的:比较由专门的上消化道(UGI)外科医生进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与 CholeS 和大型国际研究的结果。我们的假设是:UGI 专家为 LC 患者带来更好的结果。

所有在一家医院由 UGI 顾问在 1999 年至 2019 年期间进行的 LC 患者和在另一家医院由另一位 UGI 顾问外科医生在 2014 年至 2019 年期间进行的 LC 患者均被纳入研究。纳入标准为 UGI 外科医生进行的 LC。失访、由受训者进行的手术和胆囊癌患者被排除在外。报告的结果测量指标包括胆汁漏、胆管损伤、出血、感染并发症、肠损伤、血管损伤和假性动脉瘤、神经痛、端口疝、肠系膜血肿、30 天死亡率和转为开放性手术。使用统计检验来评估显著差异,置信区间为 95%,p 值为 0.05。两位 UGI 专家进行了 5122 例 LC,其中 4396 例(86%)为女性,715 例(14%)为男性。年龄为 13-93 岁(中位数为 48 岁)。3681 例(72%)为日间手术病例,1431 例(28%)为住院病例,287 例(5.6%)为急诊 LC。在手术 30 天期间无死亡,8 例(0.15%)从 Luschka 胆管漏出胆汁,4 例(0.19%)胆管(CBD)损伤,9 例(0.02%)转为开放性手术,17 例(0.33%)手术被放弃。我们的研究与 CholeS 报告在上述并发症方面存在显著差异。

当由专门的上消化道外科医生进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时,其结果可接受,胆管损伤风险低,且无死亡率。

相似文献

1
Is Specialisation Needed in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Retrospective Cohort Study of 5122 Patients.是否需要在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中进行专业化?一项对 5122 名患者的回顾性队列研究。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2020 Nov-Dec;115(6):756-766. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.115.6.756.
2
Does concentration of surgical expertise improve outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? 9 year audit cycle.手术专长的集中是否能改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果?9 年审核周期。
Surgeon. 2013 Dec;11(6):309-12. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
3
Biliary tract injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: three case reports and literature review.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆道损伤:三例报告及文献综述
G Chir. 2010 Jan-Feb;31(1-2):16-9.
4
Prevention of common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.预防腹腔镜胆囊切除术时胆总管损伤。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2009 Aug;8(4):414-7.
5
Iatrogenic bile duct injury: the scourge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.医源性胆管损伤:腹腔镜胆囊切除术的祸根。
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Feb;72(2):83-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02315.x.
6
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature.不结扎胆囊管和胆囊动脉的超声刀腹腔镜胆囊切除术
Surg Endosc. 2003 Mar;17(3):442-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9068-3. Epub 2002 Oct 29.
7
Evaluating the effects of surgical subspecialisation on patient outcomes following emergency laparotomy: A retrospective cohort study.评价外科亚专科化对急诊剖腹术后患者结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Feb;62:67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
8
Has laparoscopic cholecystectomy changed patterns of practice and patient outcome in Ontario?在安大略省,腹腔镜胆囊切除术是否改变了医疗实践模式和患者预后?
CMAJ. 1996 Feb 15;154(4):491-500.
9
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.
10
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤:一项全国性调查结果
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):549-58; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00014.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.细针穿刺细胞学检查在胆囊癌诊断中的作用:一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 6;11(8):1427. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081427.