Suppr超能文献

体外循环与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术:一项多中心试验的成本效益分析。

On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multisite trial.

机构信息

VA Palo Alto Health Economics Resource Center, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.074. Epub 2013 Aug 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Questions have been raised about the costs and outcomes for patients receiving on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. As part of the Department of Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) multisite trial, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare on-pump versus off-pump patients' quality-adjusted life-years and costs at 1 year.

METHODS

One-year outcomes and costs (standardized to 2010 dollars) were estimated in multivariate regression models, controlling for site and baseline patient factors. The 1-year incremental cost-effectiveness analysis ratio with 95% confidence intervals was calculated using bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Eighteen centers randomly assigned 2,203 participants to on-pump (n=1,099) versus off-pump (n=1,104) coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Both groups' quality of life improved significantly after surgery (p<0.01) compared with baseline, but no differences were found between treatment groups. Adjusted cost of the index coronary artery bypass graft surgery hospitalization was $36,046 on-pump and $36,536 off-pump (p=0.16). At 1 year, on-pump adjusted cost was $56,023 versus $59,623 off-pump (p=0.046). Off-pump-to-on-pump conversions after first distal anastomosis (4.8%) had significantly higher 1-year costs. Excluding conversions, there were no significant differences between treatments for index hospitalization or 1-year total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1 year, off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery was more expensive than on-pump when late off-pump-to-on-pump conversions were included. Excluding late conversions, there was no difference in quality-adjusted life-years or costs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00032630; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00032630.

摘要

背景

对于接受体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术的患者,人们对其成本和结果提出了疑问。作为退伍军人事务部随机体外循环/非体外循环旁路(ROOBY)多中心试验的一部分,进行了一项成本效益分析,以比较 1 年内体外循环与非体外循环患者的质量调整生命年和成本。

方法

在多变量回归模型中,根据站点和基线患者因素对 1 年结果和成本(标准化为 2010 美元)进行了估计。使用自举法计算了 1 年增量成本效益分析比及其 95%置信区间。

结果

18 个中心随机将 2203 名患者分配至体外循环组(n=1099)和非体外循环组(n=1104)进行冠状动脉旁路移植手术。与基线相比,两组患者手术后的生活质量均显著改善(p<0.01),但两组之间没有差异。体外循环组索引冠状动脉旁路移植手术住院费用为 36046 美元,非体外循环组为 36536 美元(p=0.16)。1 年后,体外循环组调整后的费用为 56023 美元,而非体外循环组为 59623 美元(p=0.046)。第一远端吻合口后体外循环转为体外循环的转换率为 4.8%,其 1 年成本显著更高。排除转换后,两种治疗方法在索引住院或 1 年总费用方面无显著差异。

结论

在 1 年时,包括晚期体外循环转为体外循环的转换后,非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植手术的成本高于体外循环。排除晚期转换后,两种治疗方法在质量调整生命年或成本方面无差异。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT00032630;http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00032630。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验