Suppr超能文献

诊断时的年龄可能比家族史更能推动乳腺癌患者群体中 BRCA 检测。

Age at diagnosis may trump family history in driving BRCA testing in a population of breast cancer patients.

机构信息

Authors' Affiliations: Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey; and University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Oct;22(10):1778-85. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0426. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard BRCA genetic testing criteria include young age of diagnosis, family history, and Jewish ancestry. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of these criteria on BRCA test utilization in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Breast cancer patients aged 18 to 64 years living in Pennsylvania in 2007 completed a survey on family history of breast and ovarian cancer and BRCA testing (N = 2,213). Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds of BRCA testing by patient characteristics, and predicted probabilities of testing were calculated for several clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

Young age at diagnosis (<50 years) was strongly associated with BRCA testing, with women diagnosed before age 50 years having nearly five times the odds of receiving BRCA testing compared to women diagnosed at age 50 or older (OR = 4.81; 95% CI, 3.85-6.00; P < 0.001). Despite a similar BRCA mutation prevalence estimate (8-10%), a young Jewish patient <50 years with no family history had markedly higher predicted probability of testing (63%) compared with an older, non-Jewish breast cancer patient with more than one first-degree relative (43%).

CONCLUSION

Age at diagnosis, Jewish ancestry, and both maternal and paternal family history are strongly predictive of BRCA testing. However, among women diagnosed at age 50 or older, family history may be an underused criterion that may benefit from targeted intervention.

IMPACT

Robust methods specific to ascertaining detailed family history, such as through electronic medical records, are needed to accurately identify patients for BRCA testing.

摘要

背景

标准的 BRCA 基因检测标准包括诊断时的年龄较小、家族史和犹太血统。本研究的目的是评估这些标准对乳腺癌患者 BRCA 检测利用的影响。

方法

2007 年,居住在宾夕法尼亚州的 18 至 64 岁的乳腺癌患者完成了一项关于乳腺癌和卵巢癌家族史和 BRCA 检测的调查(N=2213)。使用多变量逻辑回归估计患者特征与 BRCA 检测的比值比,并为几种临床情况计算检测的预测概率。

结果

诊断时的年龄较小(<50 岁)与 BRCA 检测密切相关,诊断年龄小于 50 岁的女性接受 BRCA 检测的可能性几乎是诊断年龄为 50 岁或以上的女性的五倍(OR=4.81;95%CI,3.85-6.00;P<0.001)。尽管 BRCA 突变患病率估计相似(8-10%),但年龄小于 50 岁且没有家族史的年轻犹太患者的检测预测概率明显更高(63%),而年龄较大、没有犹太血统且有一个以上一级亲属的乳腺癌患者的预测概率则为 43%。

结论

诊断年龄、犹太血统以及母亲和父亲的家族史都是 BRCA 检测的强烈预测因素。然而,在诊断年龄为 50 岁或以上的女性中,家族史可能是一个未被充分利用的标准,可能需要针对性的干预。

影响

需要使用特定于确定详细家族史的强大方法,例如通过电子病历,以准确识别适合 BRCA 检测的患者。

相似文献

5
Communication of BRCA results and family testing in 1,103 high-risk women.1,103 名高危女性的 BRCA 结果和家族检测的沟通。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2211-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0325. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
7
Use of BRCA Mutation Test in the U.S., 2004-2014.2004 - 2014年美国BRCA基因突变检测的使用情况
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.027. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

2
Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.家族史报告中的偏差:对临床护理的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验