• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家族史报告中的偏差:对临床护理的影响。

Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.

作者信息

Ozanne Elissa M, O'Connell Adrienne, Bouzan Colleen, Bosinoff Phil, Rourke Taryn, Dowd Dana, Drohan Brian, Millham Fred, Griffin Pat, Halpern Elkan F, Semine Alan, Hughes Kevin S

机构信息

Institute for Health Policy Studies, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x
PMID:22237666
Abstract

Family history of cancer is critical for identifying and managing patients at risk for cancer. However, the quality of family history data is dependent on the accuracy of patient self reporting. Therefore, the validity of family history reporting is crucial to the quality of clinical care. A retrospective review of family history data collected at a community hospital between 2005 and 2009 was performed in 43,257 women presenting for screening mammography. Reported numbers of breast, colon, prostate, lung, and ovarian cancer were compared in maternal relatives vs. paternal relatives and in first vs. second degree relatives. Significant reporting differences were found between maternal and paternal family history of cancer, in addition to degree of relative. The number of paternal family histories of cancer was significantly lower than that of maternal family histories of cancer. Similarly, the percentage of grandparents' family histories of cancer was significantly lower than the percentage of parents' family histories of cancer. This trend was found in all cancers except prostate cancer. Self-reported family history in the community setting is often influenced by both bloodline of the cancer history and the degree of relative affected. This is evident by the underreporting of paternal family histories of cancer, and also, though to a lesser extent, by degree. These discrepancies in reporting family history of cancer imply we need to take more care in collecting accurate family histories and also in the clinical management of individuals in relation to hereditary risk.

摘要

癌症家族史对于识别和管理癌症高危患者至关重要。然而,家族史数据的质量取决于患者自我报告的准确性。因此,家族史报告的有效性对临床护理质量至关重要。对一家社区医院在2005年至2009年期间收集的43257名接受乳腺钼靶筛查的女性的家族史数据进行了回顾性分析。比较了母系亲属与父系亲属以及一级亲属与二级亲属中报告的乳腺癌、结肠癌、前列腺癌、肺癌和卵巢癌的病例数。除了亲属程度外,还发现母系和父系癌症家族史之间存在显著的报告差异。父系癌症家族史的数量显著低于母系癌症家族史。同样,祖父母癌症家族史的比例显著低于父母癌症家族史的比例。除前列腺癌外,在所有癌症中均发现了这种趋势。社区环境中自我报告的家族史往往受到癌症家族史的血统和受影响亲属程度的影响。父系癌症家族史报告不足以及亲属程度报告不足(尽管程度较轻)都证明了这一点。癌症家族史报告中的这些差异意味着我们在收集准确的家族史以及对个体进行与遗传风险相关的临床管理时需要更加谨慎。

相似文献

1
Bias in the reporting of family history: implications for clinical care.家族史报告中的偏差:对临床护理的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2012 Aug;21(4):547-56. doi: 10.1007/s10897-011-9470-x. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
2
Contribution of extended family history in assessment of risk for breast and colon cancer.家族病史在评估乳腺癌和结肠癌风险中的作用。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Sep 1;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0521-0.
3
Paternal relatives and family history of breast cancer.父亲家族成员及乳腺癌家族史。
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Sep;31(3):265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.05.002.
4
Prevalence of hereditary breast/ovarian carcinoma risk in patients with a personal history of breast or ovarian carcinoma in a mammography population.乳腺钼靶检查人群中具有乳腺癌或卵巢癌个人史患者的遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌风险患病率
Cancer. 2005 Nov 1;104(9):1849-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21393.
5
Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States).美国不同乳腺癌家族史水平与乳腺钼靶密度的关系
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Aug;17(6):843-50. doi: 10.1007/s10552-006-0026-6.
6
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
7
Set-up of a population-based familial breast cancer registry in Geneva, Switzerland: validation of first results.瑞士日内瓦建立基于人群的家族性乳腺癌登记处:初步结果的验证
Ann Oncol. 2004 Feb;15(2):350-3. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh072.
8
Does this patient have a family history of cancer? An evidence-based analysis of the accuracy of family cancer history.该患者有癌症家族病史吗?一项关于家族癌症病史准确性的循证分析。
JAMA. 2004 Sep 22;292(12):1480-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.12.1480.
9
Validation of family history data in cancer family registries.癌症家族登记处家族病史数据的验证
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):190-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00593-7.
10
Association between family history of cancer and breast cancer defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status.癌症家族史与根据雌激素和孕激素受体状态定义的乳腺癌之间的关联。
Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(2):207-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:2<207::AID-GEPI6>3.0.CO;2-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Double Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Predisposition Genes in Hungarian Cancer Patients.匈牙利癌症患者中癌症易感基因的双致病或可能致病变异
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Aug 29;26(17):8390. doi: 10.3390/ijms26178390.
2
Sex differences in the confounders influencing the relationships linking socioeconomic factors and cognitive performance with family history of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.在混杂因素方面的性别差异,这些混杂因素影响着社会经济因素和认知表现与阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症家族史之间的关系。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 May;21(5):e70215. doi: 10.1002/alz.70215.
3
Unawareness of breast cancer family history among African women.

本文引用的文献

1
Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.家庭沟通与遗传咨询:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌案例
J Genet Couns. 1997 Mar;6(1):45-60. doi: 10.1023/A:1025611818643.
2
Prevalence of family history of breast, colorectal, prostate, and lung cancer in a population-based study.一项基于人群的研究中乳腺癌、结直肠癌、前列腺癌和肺癌家族史的患病率。
Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(7-8):495-503. doi: 10.1159/000294469. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
3
Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?
非洲女性对乳腺癌家族史的认知不足。
Pan Afr Med J. 2023 Aug 30;45:188. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2023.45.188.21616. eCollection 2023.
4
Expanding Family Health History to Include Family Medication History.将家族健康史扩展至纳入家族用药史。
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 25;13(3):410. doi: 10.3390/jpm13030410.
5
Predicting personal cardiovascular disease risk based on family health history: Development of expert-based family criteria for the general population.基于家族健康史预测个人心血管疾病风险:为普通人群制定基于专家的家族标准。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Dec;31(12):1381-1386. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01334-8. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
6
Cancer Spectrum, Family History of Cancer and Overall Survival in Men with Germline or Mutations.种系或突变男性的癌症谱、癌症家族史与总生存率
J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 15;11(9):917. doi: 10.3390/jpm11090917.
7
Implications of ACMG guidelines to identify high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients with hereditary cancer susceptibility syndromes (HCSS) in a highly consanguineous population.ACMG 指南在高度近亲结婚人群中识别具有遗传性癌症易感性综合征 (HCSS) 的高危急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的意义。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02749-2.
8
How do non-geneticist physicians deal with genetic tests? A qualitative analysis.非遗传学家的医生如何处理基因检测?定性分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Mar;30(3):320-331. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00884-z. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
9
Parent of Origin Effects on Family Communication of Risk in + Women: A Qualitative Investigation of Human Factors in Cascade Screening.母源效应在携带 BRCA1/2 突变女性家庭风险沟通中的作用:级联筛查中人为因素的定性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 17;12(8):2316. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082316.
10
'Reduced' HUNT model outperforms NLST and NELSON study criteria in predicting lung cancer in the Danish screening trial.“简化”的 HUNT 模型在丹麦筛查试验中预测肺癌的表现优于 NLST 和 NELSON 研究标准。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019 Nov 11;6(1):e000512. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2019-000512. eCollection 2019.
癌症风险认知:为何非裔美国人比白人低?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Mar;19(3):746-54. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1085. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
4
Systematic review: family history in risk assessment for common diseases.系统综述:家族史在常见疾病风险评估中的作用。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 15;151(12):878-85. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00177.
5
Electronic health records and the management of women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.电子健康记录与遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌高危女性的管理
Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15 Suppl 1:S46-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00796.x.
6
Accuracy of self-reported breast cancer among women undergoing mammography.接受乳房 X 光检查的女性中自我报告乳腺癌的准确性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Dec;118(3):583-92. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0375-4. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
7
Identification and management of women at high risk for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome.遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌综合征高危女性的识别与管理
Breast J. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):155-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00690.x.
8
Genetic assessment of breast cancer risk in primary care practice.初级医疗实践中乳腺癌风险的基因评估。
Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Mar;149A(3):349-56. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32643.
9
Family history of cancer: is it an accurate indicator of cancer risk in the immigrant population?癌症家族史:它是移民人群癌症风险的准确指标吗?
Cancer. 2008 Jan 15;112(2):399-406. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23173.
10
Estimates of heritable and environmental components of familial breast cancer using family history information.利用家族病史信息对家族性乳腺癌的遗传和环境成分进行估计。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jun 4;96(11):1740-2. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603753. Epub 2007 May 1.