Center for Studying Health System Change, Washington, DC, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1383-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0233.
Despite widespread agreement that physicians who practice defensive medicine drive up health care costs, the extent to which defensive medicine increases costs is unclear. The differences in findings to date stem in part from the use of two distinct approaches for assessing physicians' perceived malpractice risk. In this study we used an alternative strategy: We linked physicians' responses regarding their levels of malpractice concern as reported in the 2008 Health Tracking Physician Survey to Medicare Parts A and B claims for the patients they treated during the study period, 2007-09. We found that physicians who reported a high level of malpractice concern were most likely to engage in practices that would be considered defensive when diagnosing patients who visited their offices with new complaints of chest pain, headache, or lower back pain. No consistent relationship was seen, however, when state-level indicators of malpractice risk replaced self-rated concern. Reducing defensive medicine may require approaches focused on physicians' perceptions of legal risk and the underlying factors driving those perceptions.
尽管人们普遍认为实施防御性医疗的医生会推高医疗保健成本,但防御性医疗增加成本的程度尚不清楚。迄今为止,研究结果的差异部分源于使用了两种截然不同的方法来评估医生对医疗事故风险的感知。在这项研究中,我们使用了一种替代策略:我们将医生在 2008 年健康追踪医生调查中报告的对医疗事故的关注程度与他们在研究期间(2007-09 年)治疗的患者的 Medicare 部分 A 和 B 索赔联系起来。我们发现,报告高度关注医疗事故的医生在诊断因胸痛、头痛或下背痛等新症状而就诊的患者时,最有可能采取被认为是防御性的治疗方法。然而,当用州一级的医疗事故风险指标代替自我评估的关注程度时,并没有看到一致的关系。减少防御性医疗可能需要采取关注医生对法律风险的看法以及导致这些看法的潜在因素的方法。