• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

私营和公共计划中的提供者绩效衡量指标:在保持灵活性以创新的同时实现有意义的协调。

Provider performance measures in private and public programs: achieving meaningful alignment with flexibility to innovate.

机构信息

America's Health Insurance Plans, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1453-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0007.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0007
PMID:23918491
Abstract

In recent years there has been a significant expansion in the use of provider performance measures for quality improvement, payment, and public reporting. Using data from a survey of health plans, we characterize the use of such performance measures by private payers. We also compare the use of these measures among selected private and public programs. We studied twenty-three health plans with 121 million commercial enrollees--66 percent of the national commercial enrollment. The health plans reported using 546 distinct performance measures. There was much variation in the use of performance measures in both private and public payment and care delivery programs, despite common areas of focus that included cardiovascular conditions, diabetes, and preventive services. We conclude that policy makers and stakeholders who seek less variability in the use of performance measures to increase consistency should balance this goal with the need for flexibility to meet the needs of specific populations and promote innovation.

摘要

近年来,提供商绩效措施在质量改进、支付和公共报告方面的使用有了显著的扩展。我们利用一项针对健康计划的调查数据,描述了私人支付者对这类绩效措施的使用情况。我们还比较了一些私人和公共计划中这些措施的使用情况。我们研究了 23 家拥有 1.21 亿商业参保者的健康计划,占全国商业参保者的 66%。这些健康计划报告称使用了 546 种不同的绩效措施。尽管关注的重点包括心血管疾病、糖尿病和预防服务等共同领域,但在私人和公共支付和医疗服务提供计划中,绩效措施的使用存在很大差异。我们的结论是,政策制定者和利益相关者如果希望通过使用绩效措施来提高一致性,减少差异,那么他们应该在实现这一目标的同时,兼顾灵活性,以满足特定人群的需求并促进创新。

相似文献

1
Provider performance measures in private and public programs: achieving meaningful alignment with flexibility to innovate.私营和公共计划中的提供者绩效衡量指标:在保持灵活性以创新的同时实现有意义的协调。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1453-61. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0007.
2
Public accountability for health: new standards for health system performance.卫生领域的公共问责制:卫生系统绩效新标准。
Manag Care Q. 1995 Summer;3(3):17-24.
3
Do quality improvement strategies for Medicaid enrollees differ in Medicaid-dominant versus commercial managed care organizations?针对医疗补助计划参保者的质量改进策略在以医疗补助为主的组织与商业管理式医疗组织中有差异吗?
Am J Manag Care. 2003 Dec;9(12):806-16.
4
Managed care plans: characteristics, growth, and premium performance.管理式医疗计划:特点、发展及保费表现。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:437-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002253.
5
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
6
Quality assessment and health care reform: the view from the Joint Commission.质量评估与医疗改革:来自联合委员会的观点
Health Care Manag. 1994 Aug;1(1):107-14.
7
Quality management practices in Medicaid managed care: a national survey of Medicaid and commercial health plans participating in the Medicaid program.医疗补助管理式医疗中的质量管理实践:对参与医疗补助计划的医疗补助和商业健康保险计划的全国性调查。
JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1769-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1769.
8
Implementing the new HEDIS hypertension performance measure.实施新的医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)高血压绩效指标。
Manag Care. 2000 Apr;9(4 Suppl):2-17; quiz 18-21.
9
New models of health care payment and delivery.医疗保健支付与服务提供的新模式。
N C Med J. 2011 May-Jun;72(3):197-200.
10
The role of health plans in improving quality of care.健康计划在改善医疗质量方面的作用。
N C Med J. 2013 Mar-Apr;74(2):159-62.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital-level compliance with the commission on cancer's quality of care measures and the association with patient survival.医院层面符合癌症委员会的质量护理措施与患者生存的关联。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jun;10(11):3533-3544. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3875. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
The complex case of EHRs: examining the factors impacting the EHR user experience.电子健康档案的复杂案例:考察影响电子健康档案用户体验的因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):673-677. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz021.
3
Primary Care Performance Measurement and Reporting at a Regional Level: Could a Matrix Approach Provide Actionable Information for Policy Makers and Clinicians?
区域层面的基层医疗绩效评估与报告:矩阵方法能否为政策制定者和临床医生提供可付诸行动的信息?
Healthc Policy. 2016 Nov;12(2):33-51.
4
Public reporting and the evolution of diabetes quality.公共报告与糖尿病质量的演变
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Mar;15(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9167-z. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
5
Quality indicators and performance measures in diabetes care.糖尿病护理中的质量指标和绩效衡量标准。
Curr Diab Rep. 2014 Mar;14(3):472. doi: 10.1007/s11892-013-0472-y.