Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug;32(8):1462-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0846.
Despite decades of experience treating heroin or prescription opioid dependence with methadone or buprenorphine--two forms of opioid substitution therapy--gaps remain between current practices and evidence-based standards in both Canada and the United States. This is largely because of regulatory constraints and pervasive suboptimal clinical practices. Fewer than 10 percent of all people dependent on opioids in the United States are receiving substitution treatment, although the proportion may increase with expanded health insurance coverage as a result of the Affordable Care Act. In light of the accumulated evidence, we recommend eliminating restrictions on office-based methadone prescribing in the United States; reducing financial barriers to treatment, such as varying levels of copayment in Canada and the United States; reducing reliance on less effective and potentially unsafe opioid detoxification; and evaluating and creating mechanisms to integrate emerging treatments. Taking these steps can greatly reduce the harms of opioid dependence by maximizing the individual and public health benefits of treatment.
尽管几十年来,美加两国一直采用美沙酮或丁丙诺啡(两种阿片类药物替代疗法)来治疗海洛因或处方类阿片类药物成瘾,但在实践中仍存在许多空白,无法达到循证标准。这主要是因为监管限制和普遍存在的临床实践不佳。尽管由于《平价医疗法案》扩大了医疗保险覆盖范围,接受替代治疗的美国所有阿片类药物依赖者的比例可能会增加,但在美国,接受替代治疗的人数还不到所有依赖阿片类药物者的 10%。有鉴于此,我们建议消除美国对门诊美沙酮处方的限制;降低治疗的经济障碍,如加拿大和美国不同水平的共付额;减少对效果较差且可能不安全的阿片类药物脱毒的依赖;并评估和建立机制,将新兴治疗方法纳入其中。采取这些措施可以通过最大限度地提高治疗的个人和公共卫生效益,大大减少阿片类药物依赖的危害。