Suppr超能文献

29 家 CTSA 站点合同处理的观察性研究。

Observational study of contracts processing at 29 CTSA sites.

机构信息

Industry Contracts, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):279-85. doi: 10.1111/cts.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10.

Abstract

We measured contracts final negotiation (FN) and full execution (FE) times using shared definitions in a prospective observational study of management of contracts for clinical trials at 29 CTSA institutions. Median FN and FE times were reached in 39 and 91 days, respectively; mean times for FN and FE were 55 and 103 days, respectively. Individual site medians ranged from 3 to 116 days for FN and 34 to 197 days for FE. The use of master agreements (MAs) and previously negotiated terms (PNTs) was associated with significant reduction of FN times by a mean of 33 days (p < 0) and 22 days (p < 0.001), respectively. PNTs, but not MAs, were associated with significantly reduced FE time (22 days, p < 0.007). Gap analysis revealed a gap of 22 days between contracts negotiation and Institutional Review Board (IRB) review and intervals of 33 days (contracts) and 48 days (IRB review) during which the process steps were being conducted alone, suggesting a potential benefit with parallel processing. These baseline data support a plan to investigate root causes of prolonged study start-up time by examining causes of variation and outliers.

摘要

我们在 29 家 CTSA 机构中进行了一项关于临床试验合同管理的前瞻性观察研究,使用共同定义来衡量合同的最终谈判 (FN) 和全面执行 (FE) 时间。FN 和 FE 的中位数时间分别为 39 天和 91 天;FN 和 FE 的平均时间分别为 55 天和 103 天。个别站点的中位数 FN 时间范围为 3 至 116 天,FE 时间范围为 34 至 197 天。使用主协议 (MA) 和先前协商的条款 (PNT) 分别可将 FN 时间平均缩短 33 天(p < 0)和 22 天(p < 0.001)。只有 PNT,而不是 MA,与 FE 时间的显著缩短相关(22 天,p < 0.007)。差距分析显示,合同谈判和机构审查委员会 (IRB) 审查之间存在 22 天的差距,合同)和 48 天(IRB 审查)期间,各个步骤是单独进行的,这表明并行处理可能具有潜在的益处。这些基线数据支持通过检查变异和离群值的原因来调查研究启动时间延长的根本原因的计划。

相似文献

1
Observational study of contracts processing at 29 CTSA sites.29 家 CTSA 站点合同处理的观察性研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):279-85. doi: 10.1111/cts.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
6
Budget negotiation for industry-sponsored clinical trials.行业资助的临床试验的预算谈判。
Anesth Analg. 2004 Jul;99(1):173-176. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122633.97424.76.

引用本文的文献

2
Drivers of Start-Up Delays in Global Randomized Clinical Trials.全球随机临床试验启动延迟的驱动因素。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Jan;55(1):212-227. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00207-2. Epub 2020 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Reengineering translational science: the time is right.重新设计转化科学:时机已到。
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jul 6;3(90):90cm17. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002747.
6
Translational and clinical science--time for a new vision.转化医学与临床科学——开启新视野之时。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 13;353(15):1621-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb053723. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验