• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民与个人健康记录——以纳尔逊·曼德拉湾为例

Citizens and personal health records - the case of Nelson Mandela Bay.

作者信息

Pottas Dalenca, Mostert-Phipps Nicky

机构信息

School of ICT, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:501-4.

PMID:23920605
Abstract

This paper explores citizen attitudes towards personal health records. The study was conducted in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. A cross-sectional design was used and structured questionnaires administered by data collectors. Most respondents (90%) believed it to be important to extremely important for their healthcare provider to have their complete medical records. Less than half of them (42%), however, believed that the healthcare provider did have their complete medical record available to them. Nevertheless, 69% do not keep a medical record as a way to address this concern. Most of them (84%) were not aware of the existence of electronic tools to capture a personal health record prior to participating in the survey. Concerns relating to the use of online PHRs were identified as privacy (58%), lack of time (27%) and a disinterest in computers (22%). It was found that the existence of a medical chronic condition is a strong predictor of keeping a medical record (albeit mostly in paper-based format).

摘要

本文探讨了公民对个人健康记录的态度。该研究在南非东开普省进行。采用横断面设计,由数据收集者发放结构化问卷。大多数受访者(90%)认为医疗服务提供者拥有其完整的病历对他们极其重要。然而,不到一半的受访者(42%)认为医疗服务提供者确实拥有他们的完整病历。尽管如此,69%的人没有通过保存病历的方式来解决这一问题。在参与调查之前,他们中的大多数人(84%)并不知道有电子工具可用于记录个人健康记录。与在线个人健康记录使用相关的担忧包括隐私问题(58%)、缺乏时间(27%)和对计算机不感兴趣(22%)。研究发现,患有慢性疾病是保存病历(尽管大多是纸质形式)的一个有力预测因素。

相似文献

1
Citizens and personal health records - the case of Nelson Mandela Bay.公民与个人健康记录——以纳尔逊·曼德拉湾为例
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:501-4.
2
Patients prefer electronic medical records - fact or fiction?患者更喜欢电子病历——事实还是虚构?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:957.
3
The Australian general public's perceptions of having a personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).澳大利亚公众对拥有个人控制的电子健康记录(PCEHR)的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Dec;83(12):889-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
4
Attitudes of pregnant women towards personally controlled electronic, hospital-held, and patient-held medical record systems: a survey study.孕妇对个人控制的电子病历系统、医院保存的病历系统和患者保存的病历系统的态度:一项调查研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Sep;20(9):810-5. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0342. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
5
A conceptual security framework for personal health records (PHRs).个人健康记录(PHR)的概念性安全框架。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:129-31.
6
Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases.澳大利亚成年人对保护其健康信息在统计数据库中隐私的看法。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Apr;81(4):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
7
Will patients use electronic personal health records? Responses from a real-life experience.患者会使用电子个人健康记录吗?来自实际生活体验的回应。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2001 Fall;15(3):251-9.
8
Consumer attitudes toward personal health records in a beacon community.消费者对灯塔社区中个人健康记录的态度。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e104-20.
9
Will PHRs rule the waves or roll out with the tide?个人健康记录会乘风破浪还是随波逐流?
Hosp Health Netw. 2008 Aug;82(8):36-9, 1.
10
Accessing personal medical records online: a means to what ends?在线获取个人医疗记录:目的何在?
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.10.005. Epub 2014 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived challenges for adopting the Personal Health Record (PHR) at Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA)- Riyadh.沙特国民卫队卫生事务部(利雅得)采用个人健康记录(PHR)所面临的感知挑战。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2016 Dec 28;8(3):e205. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v8i3.6845. eCollection 2016.