• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子患者识别的方案入选标准之间的一致性:临床试验比较

Conformity between protocol eligibility criteria for electronic patient identification: a comparison of clinical trials.

作者信息

Kamauu Allise, Agbor Stephen, Kamauu Aaron

机构信息

Anolinx LLC, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1167.

PMID:23920941
Abstract

Clinical trial eligibility criteria define the target patient population for research studies. We assessed the eligibility criteria from 40 different protocols for Type II Diabetes Mellitus and depression (20 protocols each), to determine the extent to which protocol eligibility criteria were similar at three levels (test, test-value, and test-value-time clause). This was done to determine criteria that could be standardized to aid in identification of eligible patients from electronic health records. It was found that Type II Diabetes Mellitus had 36.9% similar and depression protocols had 53.1% similar at the test-value-clause level. This study demonstrates the need for more standardization of study protocol criteria as well as the associated query definitions to be run against the electronic healthcare data. Standardizing criteria based on the similar eligibility criteria between protocols will aid in patient recruitment by being able to reuse criteria and minimizing the time and money it takes to recruit patients.

摘要

临床试验入选标准定义了研究的目标患者群体。我们评估了40项不同的II型糖尿病和抑郁症研究方案(各20项)的入选标准,以确定方案入选标准在三个层面(测试、测试值和测试值-时间条款)的相似程度。这样做是为了确定可以标准化的标准,以帮助从电子健康记录中识别符合条件的患者。结果发现,在测试值-条款层面,II型糖尿病方案有36.9%的相似性,抑郁症方案有53.1%的相似性。这项研究表明,需要对研究方案标准以及针对电子医疗数据运行的相关查询定义进行更多标准化。根据方案之间相似的入选标准进行标准化,将有助于通过重用标准以及最大限度地减少招募患者所需的时间和资金来招募患者。

相似文献

1
Conformity between protocol eligibility criteria for electronic patient identification: a comparison of clinical trials.电子患者识别的方案入选标准之间的一致性:临床试验比较
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1167.
2
A European inventory of data elements for patient recruitment.一份欧洲患者招募数据元素清单。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:506-10.
3
Analysis of eligibility criteria from ClinicalTrials.gov.来自ClinicalTrials.gov的资格标准分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:853-7.
4
Requirements for a patient recruitment system.患者招募系统的要求。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:521-5.
5
A method for probing disease relatedness using common clinical eligibility criteria.一种使用通用临床入选标准探究疾病关联性的方法。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:481-5.
6
Protocol feasibility workflow using an automated multi-country patient cohort system.使用自动化多国患者队列系统的方案可行性工作流程。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:985-9.
7
Query engine optimization for the EHR4CR protocol feasibility scenario.针对EHR4CR协议可行性场景的查询引擎优化。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1080.
8
Recruit--An Ontology Based Information Retrieval System for Clinical Trials Recruitment.Recruit——一个基于本体的临床试验招募信息检索系统。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:534-8.
9
Automatic Selection of Clinical Trials Based on A Semantic Web Approach.基于语义网方法的临床试验自动选择
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:564-8.
10
Supporting patient screening to identify suitable clinical trials.支持患者筛查以确定合适的临床试验。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:823-7.