• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较表观扩散系数和 T2 弛豫时间变化模式在评估年龄和椎间盘水平相关椎间盘变化中的应用。

Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation time variation patterns in assessment of age and disc level related intervertebral disc changes.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, PR China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069052. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069052
PMID:23922680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3724871/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the variation patterns of ADC and T2 values in different age and intervertebral disc (IVD) levels, thus to identify their sensitivities in assessing age and disc level related IVDs changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The T2 and ADC values were recorded from 345 IVDs of 69 volunteers. Kendall's correlation analysis was used to identify the relationship between age and T2/ADC mean values respectively. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc analysis was then applied to test the differences of T2 and ADC values among different IVD levels and age groups, followed by linear regression analysis between age (<45 and >45 years) and T2/ADC mean values. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and the Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

RESULTS

Significant negative correlation was observed between age and T2/ADC mean values. The T2 and ADC values showed significant differences among IVD levels and among age groups except for T2 values in age group 1 (25-34 years) and group 2 (35-44 years), and for ADC values at L1-2 level. Both T2 and ADC values showed significant differences between young (age<45 years) and elderly group (age>45 years) at each IVD level. A linear relationship was observed between age and T2/ADC mean values in the elderly group as well as in the young group for the ADC mean values, while no such tendency was identified in the young group for the T2 mean values.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC values may be a more sensitive parameter than T2 in assessing age and disc level related intervertebral disc changes.

摘要

目的

比较不同年龄和椎间盘(IVD)水平的 ADC 值和 T2 值的变化模式,从而确定它们在评估年龄和椎间盘水平相关的 IVD 变化中的敏感性。

材料和方法

从 69 名志愿者的 345 个椎间盘记录 T2 和 ADC 值。Kendall 相关分析用于分别确定年龄与 T2/ADC 平均值之间的关系。然后应用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和事后分析来测试不同 IVD 水平和年龄组之间的 T2 和 ADC 值的差异,然后进行年龄(<45 岁和>45 岁)与 T2/ADC 平均值之间的线性回归分析。本研究得到中国医学科学院和北京协和医学院医院伦理委员会的批准。

结果

年龄与 T2/ADC 平均值之间存在显著负相关。除了年龄组 1(25-34 岁)和组 2(35-44 岁)的 T2 值以及 L1-2 水平的 ADC 值外,IVD 水平和年龄组之间的 T2 和 ADC 值均存在显著差异。在每个 IVD 水平上,年轻组(年龄<45 岁)和老年组(年龄>45 岁)之间的 T2 和 ADC 值均存在显著差异。在老年组和年轻组中,ADC 平均值与年龄之间存在线性关系,但在年轻组中,T2 平均值与年龄之间没有这种趋势。

结论

在评估年龄和椎间盘水平相关的椎间盘变化方面,ADC 值可能比 T2 值更敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/1755ccabe8bd/pone.0069052.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/f6c8ad6127db/pone.0069052.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/5540522ce742/pone.0069052.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/1755ccabe8bd/pone.0069052.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/f6c8ad6127db/pone.0069052.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/5540522ce742/pone.0069052.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67c7/3724871/1755ccabe8bd/pone.0069052.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2 relaxation time variation patterns in assessment of age and disc level related intervertebral disc changes.比较表观扩散系数和 T2 弛豫时间变化模式在评估年龄和椎间盘水平相关椎间盘变化中的应用。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069052. Print 2013.
2
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs: a new method to potentially quantify the physiologic effect of physical therapy intervention.正常和退变腰椎间盘的扩散加权磁共振成像:一种潜在量化物理治疗干预生理效应的新方法。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Feb;38(2):42-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2631. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
3
MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation.磁共振成像评估腰椎间盘退变和年龄相关性变化:表观扩散系数与 T2 定量。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1617-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2556. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
4
Characterization of Age-Related and Sex-Related Differences of Relaxation Parameters in the Intervertebral Disc Using MR-Fingerprinting.利用磁共振指纹技术对椎间盘弛豫参数的年龄相关性和性别相关性差异进行特征描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Apr;59(4):1312-1324. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28925. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
[The use of apparent diffusion coefficient in diagnosis of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration in patients with middle and old age by diffusion-weighted MRI.].[磁共振扩散加权成像中表观扩散系数在中老年腰椎间盘退变诊断中的应用。]
Adv Gerontol. 2018;31(1):103-109.
6
Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration.腰椎间盘退变中表观扩散系数的评估
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1830-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3285-z. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
7
Diffusion based MR measurements correlates with age-related changes in human intervertebral disks.基于扩散的磁共振测量与人类椎间盘的年龄相关变化相关。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Jan;61:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
8
The importance of level stratification for quantitative MR studies of lumbar intervertebral discs: a cross-sectional analysis in 101 healthy adults.腰椎间盘定量磁共振研究中水平分层的重要性:101 例健康成年人的横断面分析。
Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2153-2161. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06059-1. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and degenerated intervertebral lumbar disks: initial experience.正常和退变腰椎间盘表观扩散系数的评估:初步经验
Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):569-74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040437. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
10
Diffusion-weighted 7.0T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration in Rats.7.0T 磁共振弥散加权成像在评估大鼠椎间盘退变中的应用。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jan 5;131(1):63-68. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.221261.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship Between Quantitative MRI and Radiological, Histological, and Biochemical Measures of Intervertebral Disc Health in Client-Owned, Nonchondrodystrophic-Breed Dogs.在非软骨发育不良品种的家养犬中,定量MRI与椎间盘健康的放射学、组织学和生化指标之间的关系。
JOR Spine. 2025 Aug 13;8(3):e70105. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.70105. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Characterization of Age-Related and Sex-Related Differences of Relaxation Parameters in the Intervertebral Disc Using MR-Fingerprinting.利用磁共振指纹技术对椎间盘弛豫参数的年龄相关性和性别相关性差异进行特征描述。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Apr;59(4):1312-1324. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28925. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ex vivo observation of human intervertebral disc tissue and cells isolated from degenerated intervertebral discs.体外观察人退变椎间盘组织和细胞。
Eur Spine J. 2012 May;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2234-y. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
2
Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的流行病学。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Apr;25(2):173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.012.
3
Histological analysis of surgical lumbar intervertebral disc tissue provides evidence for an association between disc degeneration and increased body mass index.
Apparent diffusion coefficient and T2* mapping on 3T MRI in normal and degenerative lumbar intervertebral discs.
3T磁共振成像中正常和退变腰椎间盘的表观扩散系数及T2* 成像
Pol J Radiol. 2023 Jun 12;88:e275-e285. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2023.128882. eCollection 2023.
4
Sagittal balance and intervertebral disc composition in patients with low back pain.腰痛患者的矢状平衡与椎间盘成分。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2022 Nov 11;55:e12015. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2022e12015. eCollection 2022.
5
Diffusion properties of asymptomatic lumbar intervertebral discs in a pediatric cohort: a preliminary study of apparent diffusion coefficient.无症状儿童腰椎间盘的扩散特性:表观扩散系数的初步研究。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Nov;31(11):2943-2949. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07342-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
6
Intradiscal Injection of Autologous Discogenic Cells in Patients with Discectomy: A Prospective Clinical Study of Its Safety and Feasibility.经皮椎间盘内自体髓核细胞移植治疗腰椎间盘切除术后椎间盘源性腰痛:前瞻性临床研究安全性和可行性。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022 May 27;11(5):490-503. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szac013.
7
Imaging Evaluation of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration and Painful Discs-Advances and Challenges in Quantitative MRI.椎间盘退变与疼痛性椎间盘的影像学评估——定量MRI的进展与挑战
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 14;12(3):707. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030707.
8
Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tools for the Diagnosis of Degenerative Disc Disease: A Narrative Review.用于诊断椎间盘退变疾病的新型磁共振成像工具:一篇叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;12(2):420. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020420.
9
Assessment of lumbar disc herniaton using fractional anisotropy in diffusion tensor imaging along with conventional T2-weighted imaging.利用扩散张量成像中的分数各向异性以及传统T2加权成像评估腰椎间盘突出症。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Feb;33(1):24-31. doi: 10.1177/1971400919891288. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
10
Quantitative Predictive Imaging Biomarkers of Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.腰椎间盘退变的定量预测成像生物标志物
Asian Spine J. 2019 Apr 2;13(4):527-534. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0166. Print 2019 Aug.
腰椎手术取出的椎间盘组织的组织学分析为椎间盘退变与体重指数增加之间的关联提供了证据。
BMC Res Notes. 2011 Nov 16;4:497. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-497.
4
MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantitation.磁共振成像评估腰椎间盘退变和年龄相关性变化:表观扩散系数与 T2 定量。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1617-23. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2556. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
5
Correlation between T2 relaxation time and intervertebral disk degeneration.T2 弛豫时间与椎间盘退变的相关性。
Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Feb;41(2):163-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1144-0. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
6
Lumbar intervertebral disc abnormalities: comparison of quantitative T2 mapping with conventional MR at 3.0 T.腰椎间盘异常:3.0T 磁共振常规 MR 与定量 T2 映射的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):2715-22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1843-2. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
7
The immediate reduction in low back pain intensity following lumbar joint mobilization and prone press-ups is associated with increased diffusion of water in the L5-S1 intervertebral disc.腰椎关节松动术和俯姿俯卧撑后即刻降低下腰痛强度与 L5-S1 椎间盘内水的弥散增加有关。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):256-64. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3284.
8
Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals.一项针对1043人的人群研究中腰椎磁共振成像变化的患病率及模式
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 20;34(9):934-40. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a01b3f.
9
Association between visual degeneration of intervertebral discs and the apparent diffusion coefficient.椎间盘视觉退变与表观扩散系数之间的关联
Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jun;27(5):641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
10
Quantitative MRI as a diagnostic tool of intervertebral disc matrix composition and integrity.定量磁共振成像作为椎间盘基质成分和完整性的诊断工具。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):432-40. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0744-4. Epub 2008 Nov 13.