Zulauf M
Universitäts-Augenklinik, Basel, Switzerland.
Ophthalmologica. 1990;201(1):37-44. doi: 10.1159/000310123.
In a double-masked, short-term study on 12 healthy elderly volunteers, angioscotomas and contrast sensitivities were measured 2 h after treatment with placebo, pindolol 1% and timolol 0.5%. In perimetry, angioscotomas did neither change in deepness nor in diameter significantly. However, the mean differential light sensitivity was highest with timolol (15.5 dB) and lower with pindolol (15.2 dB p less than 0.018) and placebo (15.0 dB; p less than 0.004). In contrast sensitivity testings, the mean contrast sensitivity was lowest with timolol (15.0 dB) and higher with pindolol (15.3 dB p less than 0.001) and placebo (15.7 dB; p less than 0.001). The differences between pindolol and placebo were not significant in both tests. The contrasting results may be explained by the locations where retinal sensitivity was tested, near or far from retinal vessels i.e. foveally or near the blind spot. Pharmacologically, the main difference between the two medications is the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of pindolol.
在一项针对12名健康老年志愿者的双盲短期研究中,在给予安慰剂、1%吲哚洛尔和0.5%噻吗洛尔治疗2小时后,测量了血管暗点和对比敏感度。在视野检查中,血管暗点的深度和直径均无显著变化。然而,噻吗洛尔的平均微分光敏感度最高(15.5分贝),吲哚洛尔较低(15.2分贝,p<0.018),安慰剂最低(15.0分贝;p<0.004)。在对比敏感度测试中,噻吗洛尔的平均对比敏感度最低(15.0分贝),吲哚洛尔较高(15.3分贝,p<0.001),安慰剂最高(15.7分贝;p<0.001)。在两项测试中,吲哚洛尔与安慰剂之间的差异均不显著。这些对比结果可能是由于视网膜敏感度测试的位置不同,即靠近或远离视网膜血管,也就是在中央凹或盲点附近。从药理学角度来看,这两种药物的主要区别在于吲哚洛尔具有内在拟交感活性。