Wittich Angelina R, Williams Beverly Rosa, Bailey F Amos, Woodby Lesa L, Burgio Kathryn L
Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):113-24.
As a patient approaches death, family members often are asked about their loved one's preferences regarding treatment at the end of life. Advance care directives may provide information for families and surrogate decision makers; however, less than one-third of Americans have completed such documents. As the U.S. population continues to age, many surrogate decision makers likely will rely on other means to discern or interpret a loved one's preferences. While many surrogates indicate that they have some knowledge of their loved one's preferences, how surrogates obtain such knowledge is not well understood. Additionally, although research indicates that the emotional burden of end-of-life decision making is diminished when surrogates have knowledge that a loved one's preferences are honored, it remains unclear how surrogates come to know these preferences were carried out. The current study examined the ways that next of kin knew veterans' end-of-life preferences, and their ways of knowing whether those preferences were honored in Veteran Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) inpatient settings.
当患者临近死亡时,家属常常会被问及他们所爱的人在生命末期对于治疗的偏好。预先护理指示可为家属和替代决策者提供信息;然而,不到三分之一的美国人完成了此类文件。随着美国人口持续老龄化,许多替代决策者可能会依靠其他方式来辨别或解读所爱的人的偏好。虽然许多替代决策者表示他们对所爱的人的偏好有所了解,但替代决策者如何获得这些知识却不太清楚。此外,尽管研究表明,当替代决策者知道所爱的人的偏好得到尊重时,临终决策的情感负担会减轻,但仍不清楚替代决策者是如何知道这些偏好得到执行的。当前的研究考察了亲属了解退伍军人临终偏好的方式,以及他们了解这些偏好在退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC)住院环境中是否得到尊重的方式。