Nilsson Stefan, Björkman Berit, Almqvist Anna-Lena, Almqvist Lena, Björk-Willén Polly, Donohue Dana, Enskär Karin, Granlund Mats, Huus Karina, Hvit Sara
CHILD, School of Health Sciences, Borås University , Borås , Sweden .
Dev Neurorehabil. 2015 Jun;18(3):162-8. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.801529. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
The aim of this paper was to discuss differences between having a child perspective and taking the child's perspective based on the problem being investigated.
Conceptual paper based on narrative review.
The child's perspective in research concerning children that need additional support are important. The difference between having a child perspective and taking the child's perspective in conjunction with the need to know children's opinions has been discussed in the literature. From an ideological perspective the difference between the two perspectives seems self-evident, but the perspectives might be better seen as different ends on a continuum solely from an adult's view of children to solely the perspective of children themselves. Depending on the research question, the design of the study may benefit from taking either perspective. In this article, we discuss the difference between the perspectives based on the problem being investigated, children's capacity to express opinions, environmental adaptations and the degree of interpretation needed to understand children's opinions.
The examples provided indicate that children's opinions can be regarded in most research, although to different degrees.
本文旨在基于所研究的问题，探讨拥有儿童视角与采纳儿童视角之间的差异。
基于叙述性综述的概念性论文。
在针对需要额外支持的儿童的研究中，儿童视角很重要。文献中已讨论了拥有儿童视角与采纳儿童视角以及了解儿童意见的必要性之间的差异。从意识形态角度看，这两种视角的差异似乎不言而喻，但仅从成人对儿童的看法到完全是儿童自身的视角，这两种视角或许更应被视为连续统一体上的不同端点。根据研究问题的不同，研究设计采用其中任何一种视角可能都会有所助益。在本文中，我们基于所研究的问题、儿童表达意见的能力、环境适应性以及理解儿童意见所需的解释程度来讨论这两种视角之间的差异。
所提供的例子表明，在大多数研究中都可以考虑儿童的意见，尽管程度有所不同。
