• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痴呆症临终关怀反馈:随访项目研究方案。

Feedback on end-of-life care in dementia: the study protocol of the FOLlow-up project.

机构信息

Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Aug 7;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-29.

DOI:10.1186/1472-684X-12-29
PMID:23924229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751417/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-of-life care in dementia in nursing homes is often found to be suboptimal. The Feedback on End-of-Life care in dementia (FOLlow-up) project tests the effectiveness of audit- and feedback to improve the quality of end-of-life care in dementia.

METHODS/DESIGN: Nursing homes systematically invite the family after death of a resident with dementia to provide feedback using the End-of-Life in Dementia (EOLD) - instruments. Two audit- and feedback strategies are designed and tested in a three-armed Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT): a generic feedback strategy using cumulative EOLD-scores of a group of patients and a patient specific feedback strategy using EOLD-scores on a patient level. A total of 18 nursing homes, three groups of six homes matched on size, geographic location, religious affiliation and availability of a palliative care unit were randomly assigned to an intervention group or the control group. The effect on quality of care and quality of dying and the barriers and facilitators of audit- and feedback in the nursing home setting are evaluated using mixed-method analyses.

DISCUSSION

The FOLlow-up project is the first study to assess and compare the effect of two audit- and feedback strategies to improve quality of care and quality of dying in dementia. The results contribute to the development of practice guidelines for nursing homes to monitor and improve care outcomes in the realm of end-of-life care in dementia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR).

TRIAL NUMBER

NTR3942.

摘要

背景

在养老院中,痴呆患者的临终关怀往往不尽如人意。“痴呆患者临终关怀反馈(FOLlow-up)”项目旨在测试审核和反馈对改善痴呆患者临终关怀质量的有效性。

方法/设计:养老院系统地在痴呆症患者去世后邀请家属提供反馈,使用《痴呆患者临终评估工具(EOLD)》。设计并测试了两种审核和反馈策略:一种是使用一组患者的累积 EOLD 评分的通用反馈策略,另一种是使用患者个体 EOLD 评分的患者特异性反馈策略。共有 18 家养老院,按照规模、地理位置、宗教信仰和姑息治疗单位的可用性分为三组,每组 6 家,随机分配到干预组或对照组。使用混合方法分析评估对护理质量和临终质量的影响,以及审核和反馈在养老院环境中的障碍和促进因素。

讨论

“FOLlow-up”项目是第一项评估和比较两种审核和反馈策略以改善痴呆症患者护理质量和临终质量的研究。研究结果有助于为养老院制定实践指南,以监测和改善痴呆患者临终关怀领域的护理结果。

注册

荷兰国家试验注册处(NTR)。

注册号

NTR3942。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a43f/3751417/c836bc60697f/1472-684X-12-29-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a43f/3751417/c836bc60697f/1472-684X-12-29-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a43f/3751417/c836bc60697f/1472-684X-12-29-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Feedback on end-of-life care in dementia: the study protocol of the FOLlow-up project.痴呆症临终关怀反馈:随访项目研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Aug 7;12(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-29.
2
Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial.两种反馈干预措施对养老院痴呆患者临终结局的影响:一项基于群组的三臂随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):693-702. doi: 10.1177/0269216317750071. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
4
Effects of facilitated family case conferencing for advanced dementia: A cluster randomised clinical trial.便利式家庭病例讨论会对晚期痴呆症的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0181020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181020. eCollection 2017.
5
Dementia Care Mapping™ to reduce agitation in care home residents with dementia: the EPIC cluster RCT.痴呆症关爱映射™以减少养老院痴呆症患者的激越:EPIC 集群 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(16):1-172. doi: 10.3310/hta24160.
6
Trends in quality of care and dying perceived by family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia 2005-2019.2005-2019 年,家庭护理员对患有痴呆症的养老院居民的护理质量和临终关怀的认知趋势。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1951-1960. doi: 10.1177/02692163211030831. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data (INFORM): Protocol for a cluster-randomized trial.通过绩效数据反馈改善养老院护理(INFORM):一项整群随机试验的方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 10;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1748-8.
8
Improving comfort in people with dementia and pneumonia: a cluster randomized trial.改善痴呆症合并肺炎患者的舒适度:一项整群随机试验。
BMC Med. 2016 Aug 11;14(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0663-x.
9
Improving person-centred care in nursing homes through dementia-care mapping: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.通过痴呆症关怀映射提高养老院的以人为主的关怀:一项集群随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jan 3;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-1.
10
Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study.六个国家养老院居民临终质量和临终关怀质量:一项流行病学研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1584-1595. doi: 10.1177/0269216318800610. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the DEDICATED approach to optimizing palliative care for people with dementia: a multi-method study.DEDICATED方法对优化痴呆症患者姑息治疗的影响:一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13063-3.
2
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 28;9(9):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub3.
3
Trends in quality of care and dying perceived by family caregivers of nursing home residents with dementia 2005-2019.

本文引用的文献

1
White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care.定义老年痴呆症患者最佳姑息治疗的白皮书:来自欧洲姑息治疗协会的德尔菲研究和建议。
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):197-209. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493685. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
2
Retrospective and prospective data collection compared in the Dutch End Of Life in Dementia (DEOLD) study.回顾性和前瞻性数据收集在荷兰痴呆症末期研究(DEOLD)中进行了比较。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2014 Jan-Mar;28(1):88-94. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318293b380.
3
[Improved end-of-life care for patients with dementia: greater family satisfaction and possibly greater end-of-life comfort].
2005-2019 年,家庭护理员对患有痴呆症的养老院居民的护理质量和临终关怀的认知趋势。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):1951-1960. doi: 10.1177/02692163211030831. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
4
Evaluation of a Palliative Care Program for Nursing Homes in 7 Countries: The PACE Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.评估 7 个国家养老院姑息治疗项目:PACE 集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Feb 1;180(2):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5349.
5
Effects of two feedback interventions on end-of-life outcomes in nursing home residents with dementia: A cluster-randomized controlled three-armed trial.两种反馈干预措施对养老院痴呆患者临终结局的影响:一项基于群组的三臂随机对照试验。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):693-702. doi: 10.1177/0269216317750071. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
6
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
[改善痴呆症患者的临终关怀:提高家庭满意度并可能提升临终舒适度]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(17):A5324.
4
Selecting the best instruments to measure quality of end-of-life care and quality of dying in long term care.选择最佳工具来衡量长期护理临终关怀质量和临终质量。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Mar;14(3):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.09.019. Epub 2012 Nov 17.
5
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
6
Using client experiences for quality improvement in long-term care organizations.利用客户体验来改善长期护理机构的服务质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Jun;24(3):224-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs013. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
7
Patients' experiences of the quality of long-term care among the elderly: comparing scores over time.患者对老年人长期护理质量的体验:比较随时间的评分。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 31;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-26.
8
Family perceptions of end-of-life care for long-term care residents with dementia: differences between the United States and the Netherlands.美国家庭对长期护理痴呆患者临终关怀的看法:与荷兰的差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Feb;60(2):316-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03816.x. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
9
Advanced dementia: state of the art and priorities for the next decade.晚期痴呆:未来十年的现状和重点。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 1):45-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00008.
10
Psychometric properties of instruments to measure the quality of end-of-life care and dying for long-term care residents with dementia.用于评估痴呆长期护理居民临终关怀和死亡质量的工具的心理测量特性。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):671-84. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9978-4. Epub 2011 Aug 5.