Department of Anesthesia, Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510655, China.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(15):2894-9.
Whether plasma can transfer the protective effect(s) of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) between animals remains unresolved. We therefore investigated the effects of plasma collected 48 hours after transient limb ischemia on blood pressure recovery during myocardial ischemia reperfusion (IR) in homogenic rats.
Plasma was collected from Lewis rats, and the donor rats were randomly assigned to 2 groups: transient limb ischemia and control (n = 8 each). Transient limb ischemia was achieved by four cycles of 5-minute ischemia and 5-minute reperfusion by noninvasive ligation and deligation of the both legs using elastic rubber bands after anesthesia. In the control group, no ligation was performed. Forty-eight hours later, whole blood was collected, and the plasma spun off. Study Lewis rats underwent 30-minute left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by 180-minute reperfusion, and were randomly assigned to 2 groups (group A and group B, n = 24 each), each further subdivided into 3 subgroups (n = 8 each). The subgroups of group A received normal saline (group A1) , plasma of control rats (group A2), plasma of transient limb ischemia rats (group A3) respectively at 1 hour before IR; the subgroups of group B received normal saline (group B1), plasma of control rats (group B2), plasma of transient limb ischemia rats (group B3) respectively at 24 hours before IR. BIOPAC systems were used to measure hemodynamics of rats during myocardial ischemiareperfusion.
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) after IR in group B3 was different from that in groups B1 and B2 (B3 vs. B1, P = 0.007; B3 vs. B2, P = 0.039) at the beginning of reperfusion and 30 minutes after reperfusion. SBP was higher in group B3 than in groups B1 and B2 at the beginning of perfusion (B3 vs. B1, P = 0.010; B3 vs. B2, P = 0.002) and 30 minutes after reperfusion (B3 vs. B1, P = 0.001; B3 vs. B2, P = 0.001). SBP did not differ among subgroups A1, A2 and A3. Diastolic blood pressure and heart rate did not change in group A or group B.
The transfusion of plasma collected 48 hours after transient limb ischemia into homogenic rats 24 hours before IR can improve the SBP recovery during reperfusion. This may suggest that cardioprotective effect of late phase of RIPC is transferable via plasma.
目前尚不清楚在体循环中输注 48 小时后的肢体缺血预处理(RIPC)的血浆是否能转移其保护作用。因此,我们研究了同种大鼠心肌缺血再灌注(IR)期间,48 小时后收集的血浆对血压恢复的影响。
我们从 Lewis 大鼠中收集血浆,供体大鼠随机分为两组:短暂肢体缺血和对照组(每组 8 只)。在麻醉下通过无创弹性橡胶带反复结扎和松开双下肢,实现短暂肢体缺血,实现 4 个周期的 5 分钟缺血和 5 分钟再灌注。在对照组中,不进行结扎。48 小时后,采集全血并离心分离血浆。研究 Lewis 大鼠接受 30 分钟左前降支冠状动脉闭塞,然后进行 180 分钟再灌注,并随机分为两组(A 组和 B 组,每组 24 只),每组进一步分为 3 个亚组(每组 8 只)。A 组的亚组在 IR 前 1 小时分别接受生理盐水(A1 组)、对照组大鼠的血浆(A2 组)、短暂肢体缺血大鼠的血浆(A3 组);B 组的亚组在 IR 前 24 小时分别接受生理盐水(B1 组)、对照组大鼠的血浆(B2 组)、短暂肢体缺血大鼠的血浆(B3 组)。BIOPAC 系统用于测量大鼠在心肌缺血再灌注期间的血液动力学。
再灌注开始时和再灌注 30 分钟时,B3 组的收缩压(SBP)与 B1 组和 B2 组不同(B3 与 B1,P = 0.007;B3 与 B2,P = 0.039)。B3 组的 SBP 在再灌注开始时和再灌注 30 分钟时均高于 B1 组和 B2 组(B3 与 B1,P = 0.010;B3 与 B2,P = 0.002)。A1、A2 和 A3 亚组的 SBP 无差异。A 组或 B 组的舒张压和心率没有变化。
在 IR 前 24 小时输注 48 小时后收集的短暂肢体缺血的血浆可改善再灌注期间的 SBP 恢复。这可能表明,RIPC 后期的心脏保护作用可以通过血浆传递。