Zhao Yang, Zheng Zhi-Nan, Pi Yan-Na, Liang Xue, Jin San-Qing
Department of Anesthesia, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, No. 26 Yuancunerheng Road, Guangzhou 510655, China.
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:8526561. doi: 10.1155/2017/8526561. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
A previous study in our laboratory demonstrated that transfusion of plasma collected at the late phase of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) could reduce myocardial infarct size. Here, we tested whether the reperfusion injury salvage kinase (RISK) and survivor activating factor enhancement (SAFE) pathways are involved in transferring protection. In a two-part study, donor rats ( = 3) donated plasma 48 hours after RIPC (preconditioned plasma) or control (nonpreconditioned plasma). Normal (part 1) or ischemic (part 2) myocardia were collected from recipients ( = 6) 24 hours after receiving normal saline, nonpreconditioned plasma, and preconditioned plasma or after further suffering ischemia reperfusion. Western blot was performed to analyze STAT3, Akt, and Erk1/2 phosphorylation in normal and ischemic myocardium (central area and border area). In normal myocardia, preconditioned plasma increased Akt and Erk1/2 phosphorylation significantly compared to nonpreconditioned plasma and normal saline; no STAT3 phosphorylation was detected. In ischemic myocardia, preconditioned plasma increased Akt and Erk1/2 phosphorylation significantly in both central and border areas compared to other fluids; no significant difference in STAT3 phosphorylation occurred among groups. Transfusion of preconditioned plasma collected at the late phase of RIPC could activate the RISK but not SAFE pathway, suggesting that RISK pathway may be involved in transferring protection.
我们实验室之前的一项研究表明,输注在远程缺血预处理(RIPC)后期采集的血浆可减小心肌梗死面积。在此,我们测试了再灌注损伤挽救激酶(RISK)和存活激活因子增强(SAFE)途径是否参与传递保护作用。在一项分为两部分的研究中,供体大鼠(n = 3)在RIPC后48小时捐献血浆(预处理血浆)或作为对照(未预处理血浆)。在接受生理盐水、未预处理血浆和预处理血浆后24小时,或在进一步遭受缺血再灌注后,从受体大鼠(n = 6)采集正常(第一部分)或缺血(第二部分)心肌。进行蛋白质免疫印迹分析正常和缺血心肌(中心区域和边缘区域)中STAT3、Akt和Erk1/2的磷酸化情况。在正常心肌中,与未预处理血浆和生理盐水相比,预处理血浆显著增加了Akt和Erk1/2的磷酸化;未检测到STAT3磷酸化。在缺血心肌中,与其他液体相比,预处理血浆在中心区域和边缘区域均显著增加了Akt和Erk1/2的磷酸化;各组间STAT3磷酸化无显著差异。输注在RIPC后期采集的预处理血浆可激活RISK途径,但不能激活SAFE途径,这表明RISK途径可能参与传递保护作用。