Campbell N, Campbell D
Royal Jubilee Hospital, Vancouver Island Health Authority, Victoria, Canada.
J Wound Care. 2013 Aug;22(8):401-2, 404-6. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.401.
Here we report a product evaluation for a non-adherent, povidone-iodine (PVP-I) dressing, determining the clinical need for the product, performing a literature review, clinical evaluation and cost-analysis, and developing a recommendation. This evaluation included 20 patients who experienced dressing pain with the previous antimicrobial dressing. Two patients discontinued the evaluation and four ulcers were non-healing; the remaining wounds closed with the PVP-I dressing. Patients indicated a preference for the PVP-I dressing, primarily due to lack of dressing pain. The PVP-I dressing was also the most cost-efficient.
在此，我们报告一项针对非粘性聚维酮碘（PVP-I）敷料的产品评估，确定该产品的临床需求，进行文献综述、临床评估和成本分析，并给出推荐意见。该评估纳入了20名曾使用过抗菌敷料并经历敷料疼痛的患者。两名患者退出评估，四个溃疡未愈合；其余伤口使用PVP-I敷料后愈合。患者表示更倾向于PVP-I敷料，主要原因是没有敷料疼痛。PVP-I敷料也是最具成本效益的。
