• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死患者无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的临床结局

Clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Sim Doo Sun, Ahn Youngkeun, Jeong Myung Ho, Kim Young Jo, Chae Shung Chull, Hong Taek Jong, Seong In Whan, Chae Jei Keon, Kim Chong Jin, Cho Myeong Chan, Seung Ki Bae

机构信息

Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int Heart J. 2013;54(4):185-91. doi: 10.1536/ihj.54.185.

DOI:10.1536/ihj.54.185
PMID:23924928
Abstract

The clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is not fully understood. We sought to assess the outcomes of patients with acute MI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for unprotected LMCA stenosis. A total of 587 patients enrolled in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry with LMCA stenosis were analyzed. Patients with culprit LMCA had higher inhospital mortality than patients with non-culprit LMCA (16.0% versus 8.9%, P = 0.008), but had similar clinical outcomes during a 12-month follow-up. Compared to CABG, PCI using drug-eluting stents (DES) was more frequently performed with similar early and 12-month clinical outcomes. The efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and zotarolimus-eluting stents were comparable at 12-month clinical follow-up. Predictors of 12-month mortality included mechanical ventilation, cardiogenic shock, age > 65 years, and ejection fraction < 40%. Patients with acute MI and culprit LMCA have higher early mortality than patients with non-culprit LMCA. PCI with DES is frequently performed and the clinical outcome is similar between the 3 types of first-generation DES.

摘要

急性心肌梗死(MI)合并无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)狭窄患者的临床结局尚未完全明确。我们旨在评估因无保护LMCA狭窄而接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性MI患者的结局。对韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究中纳入的共587例合并LMCA狭窄的患者进行了分析。罪犯血管为LMCA的患者住院死亡率高于非罪犯血管为LMCA的患者(16.0%对8.9%,P = 0.008),但在12个月随访期间临床结局相似。与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)相比,使用药物洗脱支架(DES)进行PCI更为频繁,早期和12个月临床结局相似。在12个月临床随访时,西罗莫司洗脱支架、紫杉醇洗脱支架和佐他莫司洗脱支架的疗效相当。12个月死亡率的预测因素包括机械通气、心源性休克、年龄>65岁和射血分数<40%。急性MI且罪犯血管为LMCA的患者早期死亡率高于非罪犯血管为LMCA的患者。DES PCI操作频繁,3种第一代DES之间的临床结局相似。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome of unprotected left main coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死患者无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的临床结局
Int Heart J. 2013;54(4):185-91. doi: 10.1536/ihj.54.185.
2
Clinical outcomes and predictors of unprotected left main stem culprit lesions in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者无保护左主干罪犯病变的临床结局及预测因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jun 1;83(7):E243-50. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23420. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
4
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局:ASAN-MAIN(ASAN 医疗中心-左主干血运重建)注册研究中裸金属支架 10 年和药物洗脱支架 5 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097.
5
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
7
Sirolimus-eluting stent treatment for unprotected versus protected left main coronary artery disease in widespread clinical routine: 6-month and 3-year clinical follow-up results from the prospective multicentre German Cypher Registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗广泛临床实践中无保护与有保护的左主干冠状动脉疾病:来自前瞻性多中心德国西普(Cypher)注册研究的6个月和3年临床随访结果
Heart. 2007 Oct;93(10):1251-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.104703.
8
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
The DELTA 2 Registry: A Multicenter Registry Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Obstructive Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.DELTA 2 注册研究:一项多中心注册研究,旨在评估新型药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴左主干病变的患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2401-2410. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.050.
10
Sirolimus- vs. paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: complete 2-year follow-up of a two-center registry.西罗莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄:两项中心注册研究的 2 年完整随访。
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 18;151(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.05.001. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Mortality According to Left Main and Non-Left Main Culprit Lesions - Report From the Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR).根据左主干与非左主干罪犯病变分析临床特征及院内死亡率——来自日本急性心肌梗死注册研究(JAMIR)的报告
Circ Rep. 2019 Nov 29;1(12):601-609. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-19-0056.
2
Sex differences in long-term clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction according to the presence of diabetes mellitus.根据是否患有糖尿病,急性心肌梗死的长期临床结局存在性别差异。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S99-S113. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.477. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Two-Year Outcomes after Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者行左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 2 年的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 6;2020:6980324. doi: 10.1155/2020/6980324. eCollection 2020.
4
New Predictors of Early and Late Outcomes after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Culprit Lesion.无保护左主干罪犯病变的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期和晚期结局的新预测因素。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Mar 18;2019:8238972. doi: 10.1155/2019/8238972. eCollection 2019.
5
Optimal strategy of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion (OPTIMAL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.无保护左主干冠状动脉闭塞所致急性心肌梗死的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗优化策略(OPTIMAL):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Mar 8;20(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3211-0.
6
Differences in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Compared with Western Registries.韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究与西方注册研究的差异。
Korean Circ J. 2017 Nov;47(6):811-822. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0027. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Two-year clinical outcomes in stable angina and acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention of left main coronary artery disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后稳定型心绞痛和急性冠状动脉综合征的两年临床结局
Korean J Intern Med. 2016 Nov;31(6):1084-1092. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.373. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
8
Therapeutic effect of interventional therapy for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions in aged patients.老年患者无保护左主干冠状动脉病变的介入治疗效果
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 Nov;12(6):634-40. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.005.
9
Treatment strategies in the left main coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndromes.与急性冠状动脉综合征相关的左主干冠状动脉疾病的治疗策略。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct;27(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
10
The scientific achievements of the decades in Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究数十年的科学成就。
Korean J Intern Med. 2014 Nov;29(6):703-12. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2014.29.6.703. Epub 2014 Oct 31.