Suppr超能文献

审判前报告的被告在荷兰患有智力残疾、边缘性和正常智力功能。

Pre-trial reported defendants in the Netherlands with intellectual disability, borderline and normal intellectual functioning.

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):357-61. doi: 10.1111/jar.12030.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intellectually disabled offenders may have different characteristics than offenders with average intellectual functioning. We therefore compared pre-trial reported defendants with an IQ score ≤70, 71-84 and ≥85 points.

METHODS

Nationwide database of pre-trial psychiatric reports requested by Dutch courts between 2000 and 2006 with a reported level of intellectual functioning (n = 12 186).

RESULTS

Defendants with an IQ score between 71 and 84 (n = 2 439 reports; 20.0%) and ≤70 (n = 539 reports; 4.4%) were younger, more often from an ethnic minority and more often diagnosed with psycho-organic syndromes, developmental and conduct disorders as compared with defendants with an IQ score of 85 or higher. In addition, there was an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and rape as indicted crime and a decreased odds ratio of having a steady job and cannabis abuse in defendants with an IQ score of 71-84.

CONCLUSION

Intellectually disabled defendants have different characteristics than defendants without intellectually disability.

摘要

背景

智障罪犯可能具有与智力正常罪犯不同的特征。因此,我们比较了智商得分≤70、71-84 和≥85 分的审前报告被告。

方法

2000 年至 2006 年间,荷兰法院要求全国范围内的精神病学报告数据库提供智力功能报告(n=12186)。

结果

智商得分在 71-84 分之间(n=2439 份报告;20.0%)和≤70 分(n=539 份报告;4.4%)的被告年龄更小,更多来自少数民族,更常被诊断为精神器质性综合征、发育和行为障碍,而智商得分在 85 分或以上的被告则较少。此外,智商得分在 71-84 分之间的被告,注意力缺陷多动障碍和强奸的犯罪指示风险增加,而有稳定工作和滥用大麻的可能性则降低。

结论

智障被告与非智障被告具有不同的特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验