• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性动态评估有性犯罪史的智力障碍个体再次性犯罪的风险。

Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):394-403. doi: 10.1111/jar.12029.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12029
PMID:23925962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to add to the literature on the predictive accuracy of a dynamic intellectual disability specific risk assessment tool.

METHOD

A dynamic risk assessment for sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S), a static risk assessment for sexual offending (STATIC-99), and a static risk assessment for violence (Violence Risk Appraisal Guide [VRAG]) were completed for a sample of 64 adult males with an intellectual disability.

RESULTS

The dynamic risk assessment for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability resulted in the best prediction of sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) this was better than an established sexual offending static risk assessment (STATIC-99 AUC = 0.75). A static tool for violent reoffending, did not perform as well in this group (VRAG AUC = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that dynamic variables are useful in predicting sexual reoffending with individuals with an intellectual disability, confirming previous findings. The ARMIDILO-S is a promising dynamic risk assessment for individuals with an intellectual disability.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在为智力障碍者特定的动态智力障碍风险评估工具的预测准确性提供更多的文献资料。

方法

对 64 名成年男性智力障碍者进行了动态性犯罪风险评估(ARMIDILO-S)、静态性犯罪风险评估(STATIC-99)和静态暴力风险评估(暴力风险评估指南 [VRAG])。

结果

智力障碍者性犯罪的动态风险评估(ARMIDILO-S 曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.92)对性再犯的预测效果最好,优于既定的性犯罪静态风险评估(STATIC-99 AUC = 0.75)。在这组人群中,针对暴力再犯的静态工具表现不佳(VRAG AUC = 0.58)。

结论

结果表明,动态变量对于预测智力障碍者的性再犯是有用的,这证实了之前的发现。ARMIDILO-S 是一种很有前途的针对智力障碍者的动态风险评估工具。

相似文献

1
Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour.前瞻性动态评估有性犯罪史的智力障碍个体再次性犯罪的风险。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):394-403. doi: 10.1111/jar.12029.
2
How do static and dynamic risk factors work together to predict violent behaviour among offenders with an intellectual disability?静态风险因素和动态风险因素如何共同作用来预测智障罪犯的暴力行为?
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Feb;58(2):125-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01645.x. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
3
Predicting institutional violence in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of the VRAG and the HCR-20.预测智障罪犯的机构暴力:VRAG 和 HCR-20 的预测效力。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):384-93. doi: 10.1111/jar.12032.
4
The predictive validity of common risk assessment tools in men with intellectual disabilities and problematic sexual behaviors.常见风险评估工具对患有智力障碍及性行为问题男性的预测效度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Oct;57:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
5
The relationship between maltreatment victimisation and sexual and violent offending: differences between adolescent offenders with and without intellectual disability.虐待受害经历与性犯罪及暴力犯罪之间的关系:有智力残疾和无智力残疾的青少年罪犯之间的差异。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 Nov;58(11):979-91. doi: 10.1111/jir.12031. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.性犯罪者精算风险评估工具的多地点比较
Psychol Assess. 2003 Sep;15(3):413-25. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.3.413.
7
Comparison of intellectually disabled offenders with a combined history of sexual offenses and other offenses versus intellectually disabled offenders without a history of sexual offenses on dynamic client and environmental factors.比较有性犯罪和其他犯罪史的智障罪犯与没有性犯罪史的智障罪犯在动态客户和环境因素方面的差异。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3226-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.027. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
8
Sadism and Violent Reoffending in Sexual Offenders.性犯罪者中的施虐癖与暴力再犯
Sex Abuse. 2016 Feb;28(1):46-72. doi: 10.1177/1079063214566715. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison across three levels of security.智力残疾罪犯的风险评估:三种安全级别的比较
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2008 Feb;52(1):90-111. doi: 10.1177/0306624X07308111.
10
Actuarial prediction of violent recidivism in mentally disordered offenders.精神错乱罪犯暴力再犯的精算预测。
Psychol Med. 2007 Nov;37(11):1539-49. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707000876. Epub 2007 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Sexual Offenses Committed by Men With or Without a Low IQ: An Exploratory Study.智商正常或偏低男性实施性犯罪的风险因素:一项探索性研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 25;13:820249. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.820249. eCollection 2022.
2
Screening for intellectual disability in Dutch psychiatrically disturbed detainees: Assessing the psychometric properties of the Screener for Intelligence and Learning Disability (SCIL).荷兰精神障碍被拘留者的智力障碍筛查:评估智力和学习障碍筛查器(SCIL)的心理计量学特性。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1418-1427. doi: 10.1111/jar.12769. Epub 2020 Jun 24.