Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Sep;26(5):447-65. doi: 10.1111/jar.12031.
There is an established evidence base con-cerning the use of anger management interventions with violent offenders who have intellectual disabilities. However, there has been limited research investigating the role of social cognitive factors underpinning problems of aggression. Psychosocial sources of agg-ression in the non-disabled population are generally discussed using Social Information Processing (SIP) models.
A systematic review of the available evidence was carried out to establish whether SIP offers a useful explanatory model for understanding the contribution of social cognitive factors to problems of aggression presented by people with intellectual disabilities.
Whilst research relating to the SIP model remains sparse for this population, there was evidence for different patterns of processing between aggressive and non-aggressive individuals. Group diff-erences included interpretation of emotional cues, inter-personal attributions and beliefs about the outcomes of aggressive behaviour. The future direction of SIP research with people who have intellectual disabilities is discussed, along with the possibility of using this framework to help build on current initiatives to develop individually tailored interventions to work at a cognitive level with those who are aggressive and offend.
针对具有智力障碍的暴力罪犯,使用愤怒管理干预措施已有确凿的证据基础。然而,关于作为攻击性问题基础的社会认知因素的研究却很有限。在非残疾人群中,攻击性的心理社会来源通常使用社会信息处理 (SIP) 模型来讨论。
对现有证据进行了系统回顾,以确定 SIP 是否为理解智力障碍人群攻击性问题的社会认知因素的贡献提供了有用的解释模型。
尽管针对该人群的 SIP 模型相关研究仍然很少,但有证据表明,攻击性和非攻击性个体之间存在不同的处理模式。群体差异包括对情绪线索的解释、人际归因以及对攻击性行为结果的信念。本文讨论了针对智力障碍人群的 SIP 研究的未来方向,以及使用该框架来帮助建立基于当前举措的可能性,以制定针对个体的干预措施,在认知层面上与那些具有攻击性和犯罪倾向的人合作。