Coren Esther, Ramsbotham Kerry, Gschwandtner Manfred
School of Public Health, Midwifery and Social Work, Canterbury Christ Church University, North Holmes Road, Canterbury, Kent, UK, CT1 1QU.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
Research suggests that the number of intellectually disabled people with children is increasing. Intellectual disabilities do not inevitably cause parenting difficulties, but it may impact on an individual's capacity to parent a child effectively. Children of parents with intellectual disabilities may be at increased risk of neglectful care, which could lead to health, developmental and behavioural problems, or increased risk of intellectual disability. Compared with other parents, those with intellectual disabilities are more likely to be involved in care proceedings.
To assess the effectiveness of parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disabilities designed to support parenting, parent-child relations, safe parenting or family environments, or to develop parenting skills.
In July 2017, we searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and six other databases as well as two trials registers. We also searched reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field to identify additional ongoing and unpublished studies.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disabilities with treatment as usual or a control group.
We used standardised Cochrane methods.
As of July 2017, we identified four trials with 192 participants that met the review inclusion criteria. Participating parents were mostly mothers (seven fathers were included in two studies), and children's ages ranged from one month to six years and five months.One study was conducted in Australia, one in Canada, one in the Netherlands, and one in the USA. Each studied a different intervention and considered different outcomes. Three interventions were delivered at home, and one in a community venue (e.g. a church). Interventions varied in duration from seven weeks to 12 months. They included a range of practical childcare skills, home safety and developing parents' ability to respond sensitively to their children. Parents in the comparison groups included in the review received treatment as usual and most of these received the index intervention after the study was complete.One study was funded by the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and the Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services Research Grants Program; one by the Alabama Development Disabilities Council; one by the Best Practice Parenting Education Initiative of the Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services and the New South Wales Aging and Disability Department; and one by ZonMw, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.It was not possible for us to conduct a meta-analysis. The GRADE quality assessment varied from very low to moderate across the studies.Primary outcomesNo study reported on the 'attainment of specific parenting skill targets'.'Safe home practices' and 'understanding of child health': one study (30 parents, very low-quality evidence) reported some improvements in parents' knowledge of life-threatening emergencies, ability to recognise dangers, and identify precautions, in favour of the intervention group. It also found limited, very low-quality evidence that parent training improved parents' ability to understand child health, implement precautions, use medicines safely, recognise child illness and symptoms, and seek medical advice (i.e. visit the doctor). Another study (22 mothers, very low-quality evidence) reported improved attainment of skills related to childcare and safety, in favour of the intervention group.Secondary outcomes'Parent-child interaction': one study (40 mothers, very low-quality evidence) reported improved maternal-child interaction following parent training at 12 months follow-up. Another study (83 mothers, 2 fathers, moderate-quality evidence) reported that inclusion in the intervention group led to a steeper decline in parenting stress related to the child compared to the control group.'Parents' retention of child': one study (22 participants; very low-quality evidence) reported that before joining the programme nine of 11 (82%) families with a previous child had had the child removed from their care by child protection authorities due to maternal maltreatment, compared with only four of 22 (19%) families after participating in the programme (only one of these four mothers had also had a previous child removed).No study reported data on: 'return to independent care of child' or 'lifting of child-related court order'.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is some very low-quality evidence that some parents, mainly mothers, with intellectual disabilities are able to provide adequate parenting if they are given appropriate training and support to learn the parenting skills they need. However, there are few studies exploring how interventions might work, for whom and in what circumstances. In particular, there have been few studies that include fathers with intellectual disabilities, or that explore the views of parents themselves.There is a need for larger RCTs of parenting interventions, with longer follow-up, before conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of parent training for this group of parents.
研究表明,有子女的智障人士数量正在增加。智力残疾并不必然导致育儿困难,但可能会影响个人有效养育子女的能力。智障父母的子女可能面临被忽视照顾的风险增加,这可能导致健康、发育和行为问题,或者增加智力残疾的风险。与其他父母相比,智障父母更有可能卷入照料程序。
评估旨在支持养育、亲子关系、安全育儿或家庭环境,或培养育儿技能的针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施的有效性。
2017年7月,我们检索了Cochrane系统评价数据库、Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和其他六个数据库以及两个试验注册库。我们还检索了纳入研究的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家以识别其他正在进行和未发表的研究。
比较针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施与常规治疗或对照组的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验。
我们采用标准化的Cochrane方法。
截至2017年7月,我们识别出四项试验,共192名参与者,符合综述纳入标准。参与的父母大多是母亲(两项研究中有7名父亲),孩子年龄从1个月到6岁零5个月不等。一项研究在澳大利亚进行,一项在加拿大,一项在荷兰,一项在美国。每项研究的干预措施不同,考虑的结果也不同。三项干预措施在家中进行,一项在社区场所(如教堂)进行。干预持续时间从7周到12个月不等。它们包括一系列实用的育儿技能、家庭安全以及培养父母对孩子敏感回应的能力。综述中对照组的父母接受常规治疗,其中大多数在研究结束后接受了索引干预措施。一项研究由安大略省心理健康基金会和安大略省社区与社会服务部研究资助计划资助;一项由阿拉巴马州发育障碍理事会资助;一项由英联邦家庭与社区服务部和新南威尔士州老龄与残疾部的最佳实践育儿教育倡议资助;一项由荷兰卫生研究与发展组织ZonMw资助。我们无法进行荟萃分析。各项研究的GRADE质量评估从极低到中等不等。
没有研究报告“实现特定育儿技能目标”的情况。“安全的家庭做法”和“对儿童健康的理解”:一项研究(30名父母,极低质量证据)报告称,干预组在父母对危及生命的紧急情况的认识、识别危险和采取预防措施的能力方面有一些改善。该研究还发现有限的、极低质量的证据表明,家长培训提高了父母理解儿童健康、采取预防措施、安全用药、识别儿童疾病和症状以及寻求医疗建议(即看医生)的能力。另一项研究(22名母亲,极低质量证据)报告称,干预组在与育儿和安全相关的技能掌握方面有所改善。
“亲子互动”:一项研究(40名母亲,极低质量证据)报告称,在12个月的随访中,家长培训后母婴互动有所改善。另一项研究(83名母亲,2名父亲,中等质量证据)报告称,与对照组相比,纳入干预组导致与孩子相关的育儿压力下降幅度更大。“父母对孩子的抚养保留情况”:一项研究(22名参与者;极低质量证据)报告称,在加入该项目之前,11个有前一个孩子的家庭中有9个(82%)因母亲虐待而被儿童保护当局剥夺了孩子的抚养权,而参与项目后,22个家庭中只有4个(19%)出现这种情况(这4名母亲中只有1名也有前一个孩子被剥夺抚养权的情况)。没有研究报告关于“恢复对孩子的独立抚养”或“解除与孩子相关的法庭命令”的数据。
有一些极低质量的证据表明,一些智障父母,主要是母亲,如果得到适当的培训和支持以学习他们所需的育儿技能,能够提供足够的养育。然而,很少有研究探讨干预措施如何起作用、对谁起作用以及在什么情况下起作用。特别是,很少有研究纳入智障父亲,或者探讨父母自身的观点。在能够就针对这类父母的家长培训的有效性得出结论之前,需要进行更大规模的、随访时间更长的育儿干预随机对照试验。