Leong Elaine
Department II (Daston), Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Boltzmannstrasse 22, Berlin, 14195, Germany
Centaurus. 2013 May;55(2):81-103. doi: 10.1111/1600-0498.12019.
When Mary Cholmeley married Henry Fairfax in 1627, she carried to her new home in Yorkshire a leather-bound notebook filled with medical recipes. Over the next few decades, Mary and Henry, their children and various members of the Fairfax and Cholmeley families continually entered new medical and culinary information into this 'treasury for health.' Consequently, as it stands now, the manuscript can be read both as a repository of household medical knowledge and as a family archive. Focusing on two Fairfax 'family books,' this essay traces on the process through which early modern recipe books were created. In particular, it explores the role of the family collective in compiling books of knowledge. In contrast to past studies where household recipe books have largely been described as the products of exclusively female endeavors, I argue that the majority of early modern recipe collections were created by family collectives and that the members of these collectives worked in collaboration across spatial, geographical and temporal boundaries. This new reading of recipe books as testaments of the interests and needs of particular families encourages renewed examination of the role played by gender in the transmission and production of knowledge in early modern households.
1627年,玛丽·乔姆利与亨利·费尔法克斯结婚时,她带着一本装满医学食谱的皮革装订笔记本,来到了位于约克郡的新家。在接下来的几十年里,玛丽和亨利、他们的孩子以及费尔法克斯家族和乔姆利家族的其他成员不断地将新的医学和烹饪信息录入这本“健康宝库”。因此,就目前的情况而言,这份手稿既可以被视为家庭医学知识的宝库,也可以被视为一份家族档案。本文聚焦于两本费尔法克斯“家族书籍”,追溯了早期现代食谱书籍的创作过程。特别是,它探讨了家庭集体在编纂知识书籍过程中所扮演的角色。与过去的研究不同,过去的研究大多将家庭食谱书籍描述为完全由女性努力的产物,我认为早期现代食谱集的大多数是由家庭集体创作的,并且这些集体的成员跨越空间、地理和时间界限进行合作。这种将食谱书籍重新解读为特定家庭的兴趣和需求的证明,促使人们重新审视性别在早期现代家庭知识传播和生产中所扮演的角色。