• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者匹配的全膝关节置换术:它有任何临床优势吗?

Patient-matched total knee arthroplasty: does it offer any clinical advantages?

作者信息

Barke Samuel, Musanhu Ed, Busch Constant, Stafford Giles, Field Richard

机构信息

South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Dorking Road, Epsom, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Jun;79(3):307-11.

PMID:23926734
Abstract

This study aimed to assess if patient-matched cutting blocks reduce operating time, blood loss and length of stay on top of improving implant alignment and offer operational or economic benefits, as claimed by manufacturers. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing TKA using patient matched technology and compared them with patients undergoing TKA using standard instrumentation; all were operated on between September 2010 and June 2012. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a single centre using the same implants. We collected data on operating time, length of stay and blood loss and also measured component alignment. Thirty-nine patients underwent TKA using patient-matched technology during the study period. Data was compared with that from 50 patients undergoing TKA using standard instrumentation during the same period. We found no significant difference in operating time, length of stay or blood loss between the two groups. There was also no difference in femoral or tibial component alignment although we did observe that the femorotibial angle of TKAs using patient-matched technology was 0.9 degrees more valgus (183.5 degrees versus 182.6 degrees, p = 0.035). In this study, patient-matched technology did not appear to give any clinical advantages over standard techniques although, equally, it did not appear to show any disadvantages. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether operational or economic benefits may be achieved by adoption of patient matched instrumentation.

摘要

本研究旨在评估与患者匹配的截骨模块是否如制造商所宣称的那样,在改善植入物对线的基础上,减少手术时间、失血量和住院时间,并带来操作或经济效益。我们回顾性分析了采用与患者匹配技术进行全膝关节置换术(TKA)的患者,并将他们与采用标准器械进行TKA的患者进行比较;所有患者均在2010年9月至2012年6月期间接受手术。所有手术均由同一中心的同一位外科医生使用相同的植入物进行。我们收集了手术时间、住院时间和失血量的数据,并测量了假体组件的对线情况。在研究期间,39例患者采用了与患者匹配的技术进行TKA。将这些数据与同期50例采用标准器械进行TKA的患者的数据进行比较。我们发现两组患者在手术时间、住院时间或失血量方面没有显著差异。股骨或胫骨假体组件的对线也没有差异,尽管我们确实观察到,采用与患者匹配技术的TKA的股胫角外翻多0.9度(分别为183.5度和182.6度,p = 0.035)。在本研究中,与患者匹配的技术似乎并没有比标准技术带来任何临床优势,同样,它似乎也没有显示出任何劣势。需要进一步的研究来评估采用与患者匹配的器械是否能实现操作或经济效益。

相似文献

1
Patient-matched total knee arthroplasty: does it offer any clinical advantages?患者匹配的全膝关节置换术:它有任何临床优势吗?
Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Jun;79(3):307-11.
2
Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?患者特异性截骨块在全膝关节置换术中是否具有成本效益?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Mar;470(3):889-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2221-3. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
Computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement: a comparison of tourniquet time, blood loss and length of stay.计算机辅助与传统全膝关节置换术:止血带使用时间、失血量及住院时间的比较
Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):606-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
4
Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).导航微创全膝关节置换术(MIS TKA)的机械精度
Knee. 2009 Jan;16(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
5
Implant positioning in TKA: comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation.全膝关节置换术中植入物的定位:传统器械与定制器械的比较
Orthopedics. 2015 Apr;38(4):e271-80. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150402-54.
6
The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.患者匹配器械在全膝关节置换术中的价值。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 Jan;27(1):153-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
7
Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:一项使用多参数定量三维CT评估对线的对照尸体研究。
Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17(2):86-95. doi: 10.3109/10929088.2012.654408.
8
The benefits of customized patient instrumentation to lower-volume joint replacement surgeons: results from practice.定制患者器械对低手术量关节置换外科医生的益处:实践结果
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011 Nov;40(11 Suppl):13-6.
9
[Bone morphing system for ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty].[全膝关节置换术中用于韧带平衡的骨形态改变系统]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;20(6):607-10.
10
Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.计算机辅助导航与传统技术在微创全膝关节置换术中的比较研究,前瞻性对照研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Sep;91(9):1382-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.对比 VISIONAIRE 个体化截骨与传统截骨在全膝关节置换术中的临床疗效:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):4379-4393. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04698-6. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block instrumentation versus standard instrumentation.使用患者特异性截骨块工具与标准工具的全膝关节置换的双盲随机对照试验。
Can J Surg. 2019 Dec 1;62(6):460-467. doi: 10.1503/cjs.018318.
3
Health costs and efficiencies of patient-specific and single-use instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial.
全膝关节置换术中定制型和一次性器械的医疗成本及效率:一项随机对照试验
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 May 29;8(2):e000493. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000493. eCollection 2019.
4
Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants.定制型后稳定型全膝关节置换植入物的早期疗效
J Orthop. 2018 Dec 6;16(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.11.003. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
5
Restoration of the Mechanical Axis in Total Knee Artrhoplasty Using Patient-Matched Technology Cutting Blocks. A Retrospective Study of 132 Cases.使用患者匹配技术截骨模块在全膝关节置换术中恢复机械轴:132例回顾性研究
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 Sep;5(5):283-289.
6
Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Should we adopt it?全膝关节置换术中的个性化器械。我们应该采用它吗?
Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Sep 15;52(3):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.06.008. eCollection 2017 May-Jun.
7
How are we addressing ligament balance in TKA? A literature review of revision etiology and technological advancement.我们如何在全膝关节置换术中实现韧带平衡?关于翻修病因和技术进展的文献综述。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(4):248-255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
8
3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.医疗环境中的3D打印技术:一项系统的文献综述
Biomed Eng Online. 2016 Oct 21;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4.
9
Verification of in vivo accuracy of Trumatch™ patient-specific instrumentation in total knee replacement using pin-less computer navigation.使用无针计算机导航技术验证Trumatch™患者特异性器械在全膝关节置换术中的体内准确性。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):125-132. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1849-9. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
10
A Systematic Literature Review of Three Modalities in Technologically Assisted TKA.技术辅助全膝关节置换术中三种方式的系统文献综述
Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:719091. doi: 10.1155/2015/719091. Epub 2015 Nov 18.