• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定制型后稳定型全膝关节置换植入物的早期疗效

Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants.

作者信息

Wheatley Benjamin, Nappo Kyle, Fisch Jesse, Rego Laura, Shay Molly, Cannova Christopher

机构信息

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.

Washington Joint Institute. Calmalier Bldg, 10215 Fernwood Rd #502, Bethesda, MD 20817, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2018 Dec 6;16(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.11.003. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2018.11.003
PMID:30765928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6355654/
Abstract

Patient-specific implants have been linked to stiffness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patient-specific implants. We performed a retrospective review with a primary outcome of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA); secondary outcomes included Knee Society Scores (KSS), Knee Society Functional Scores (KSFS), range of motion (ROM), and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS). Pre-operative measurements were similar in both groups. There was one MUA in the CPS and two in the OTS groups. There was no difference in postoperative scores. Our study suggests patient-specific implants have comparable rates of MUA and functional outcomes as conventional implants.

摘要

定制植入物与僵硬有关。本研究的目的是评估定制植入物的治疗效果。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,主要观察指标为麻醉下手法操作(MUA);次要观察指标包括膝关节协会评分(KSS)、膝关节协会功能评分(KSFS)、活动范围(ROM)和遗忘关节评分(FJS)。两组术前测量结果相似。CPS组有1例接受了MUA,OTS组有2例。术后评分无差异。我们的研究表明,定制植入物与传统植入物的MUA发生率和功能结局相当。

相似文献

1
Early outcomes of patient-specific posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty implants.定制型后稳定型全膝关节置换植入物的早期疗效
J Orthop. 2018 Dec 6;16(1):14-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.11.003. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
2
Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.初次全膝关节置换术中定制植入物与传统植入物的比较:5年时患者报告的结局无显著差异。
J Orthop. 2023 Oct 31;46:124-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.034. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Efficacy of Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Stiffness Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.麻醉下手法松解治疗全膝关节置换术后僵硬的疗效:系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1598-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.054. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
Manipulation under Anaesthesia for Patient Reported Stiffness after Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Asian Population.亚洲人群全膝关节置换术后患者自述关节僵硬的麻醉下手法治疗
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Mar;14(1):55-60. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2003.009.
5
Noise after total knee arthroplasty has limited effect on joint awareness and patient-reported clinical outcomes: retrospective study.全膝关节置换术后的噪音对关节感知和患者报告的临床结果影响有限:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 21;21(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3134-7.
6
Mid-Flexion, Anteroposterior Stability of Total Knee Replacement Implanted with Kinematic Alignment: A Randomized, Quantitative Radiographic Laxity Study with Posterior-Stabilized and Medial-Stabilized Implants.采用运动学对线植入的全膝关节置换术在屈膝中期的前后稳定性:一项关于后稳定型和内侧稳定型植入物的随机定量放射学松弛度研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Jan 4;105(1):9-19. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00549. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
7
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medial Stabilized Versus Non-Medial Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全膝关节置换术中采用内侧稳定型与非内侧稳定型假体的临床和患者报告结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):767-776.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.086. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
8
Clinical outcome of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an increased flexion gap in patients with preoperative stiffness.术前僵硬患者采用增加屈曲间隙的后稳定型全膝关节置换术的临床疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):426-433. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2018-1404.R3.
9
What Is the Efficacy of Repeat Manipulations Under Anesthesia to Treat Stiffness Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?麻醉下重复手法操作治疗初次全膝关节置换术后僵硬的疗效如何?
Surg Technol Int. 2016 Apr;28:236-41.
10
Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature.全膝关节置换术后关节纤维化和僵硬的治疗:文献的最新回顾。
Int Orthop. 2022 Jun;46(6):1253-1279. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05344-x. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
No clinical relevant differences in early clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction and objective gait and posture analysis between a custom versus off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study.定制型与现成型全膝关节置换术在早期临床结果、患者满意度以及客观步态和姿势分析方面无临床相关差异:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 15;145(1):245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05854-4.
2
High patient satisfaction with Customized Total Knee Arthroplasty at five year follow-up.患者对定制化全膝关节置换术的满意度高,随访五年后仍如此。
Int Orthop. 2024 Dec;48(12):3101-3108. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06325-y. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.初次全膝关节置换术中定制植入物与传统植入物的比较:5年时患者报告的结局无显著差异。
J Orthop. 2023 Oct 31;46:124-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.034. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
No clinical advantage with customized individually made implants over conventional off-the-shelf implants in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定制个体化假体与传统非定制假体在全膝关节置换中并无临床优势:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1311-1330. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05090-8. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
5
Custom total knee arthroplasty combined with personalised alignment grants 94% patient satisfaction at minimum follow-up of 2 years.定制全膝关节置换术结合个性化对线在至少2年的随访中患者满意度达94%。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1276-1283. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07318-x. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
6
No significant difference in early clinical outcomes of custom versus off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.定制型与现成型全膝关节置换术早期临床疗效的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Apr;31(4):1230-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06678-6. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
7
Custom TKA: what to expect and where do we stand today?定制化全膝关节置换术:有哪些期待,目前处于什么地位?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2195-2203. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04038-0. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
8
Customised, individually made total knee arthroplasty shows promising 1-year clinical and patient reported outcomes.定制化、个体化的全膝关节置换术在 1 年的临床和患者报告结果中显示出良好的前景。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Dec;141(12):2217-2225. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04045-1. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
9
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific versus Off-the-Shelf Knee Implants: A Systematic Review.定制膝关节植入物与现成膝关节植入物用于膝关节置换术后的临床和放射学结果:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 22;11(7):590. doi: 10.3390/jpm11070590.
10
Minimal important differences for the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in total knee arthroplasty patients.全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 骨关节炎指数和遗忘关节评分-12 的最小有意义差异。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 23;21(1):401. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03415-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Twenty-Five-Years and Greater, Results After Nonmodular Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty.25年及以上:非模块化骨水泥全膝关节置换术后的结果
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.043. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
2
Patient-specific implants with custom cutting blocks better approximate natural knee kinematics than standard TKA without custom cutting blocks.带有定制截骨模块的个体化植入物比没有定制截骨模块的标准全膝关节置换术更能模拟自然膝关节运动学。
Knee. 2015 Dec;22(6):624-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.08.002.
3
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.遗忘关节评分在评估全膝关节置换术结果方面具有良好的效度和信度。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
A Systematic Literature Review of Three Modalities in Technologically Assisted TKA.技术辅助全膝关节置换术中三种方式的系统文献综述
Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:719091. doi: 10.1155/2015/719091. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
5
Patient-Specific Total Knees Demonstrate a Higher Manipulation Rate Compared to "Off-the-Shelf Implants".与“现成植入物”相比,定制全膝关节的手法治疗率更高。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Jan;31(1):107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.07.041. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
6
"Forgotten knee" after total knee replacement: A pragmatic study from a single-centre cohort.全膝关节置换术后“被遗忘的膝关节”:一项来自单中心队列的实用研究。
Joint Bone Spine. 2015 May;82(3):177-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
7
No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty.特定性别的全膝关节置换术无临床益处。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Aug;85(4):415-21. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.931194. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,比较患者特定器械与传统和计算机辅助手术 (CAS) 器械的体内对线。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Feb;29(2):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
9
Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.常规与个体化手术治疗全膝关节置换术的术中结果和影像学结果:一项多中心、随机对照试验。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Oct;21(10):2206-12. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2620-y. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
10
Patient-matched total knee arthroplasty: does it offer any clinical advantages?患者匹配的全膝关节置换术:它有任何临床优势吗?
Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Jun;79(3):307-11.