Suppr超能文献

颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的比较。

Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

作者信息

Ding Chen, Hong Ying, Liu Hao, Shi Rui, Song Yueming, Li Tao

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.

出版信息

Acta Orthop Belg. 2013 Jun;79(3):338-46.

Abstract

The clinical outcome of cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is still controversial. The authors retrospectively compared the intermediate term clinical outcome of cervical disc arthroplasty and traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Seventy-six cases of single-level CSM with a minimum follow-up of two years were retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-seven patients underwent single-level cervical disc arthroplasty (Bryan disc: 12 cases; Prestige LP disc: 25 cases), while the other 39 patients underwent single-level ACDF. Significant improvement in SF-36 physical/ mental component scores and NDI score was found in both groups (p < 0.05); however, the arthroplasty group had significantly greater score improvement at each follow-up time point (p < 0.05). The JOA score and Nurick grade improved significantly at each time point in both groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). The range of motion (surgical level and C2C7) remained unchanged in the arthroplasty group (p > 0.05), whereas it decreased significantly in the ACDF group (p < 0.05). The arthroplasty group had a lower incidence of complications than the ACDF group. The intermediate outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty compared favourably to those of ACDF. Arthroplasty avoids complications from spinal fusion by preserving mobility.

摘要

颈椎间盘置换术治疗脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)的临床疗效仍存在争议。作者回顾性比较了颈椎间盘置换术与传统颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的中期临床疗效。对76例单节段CSM患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者的最短随访时间为两年。37例患者接受了单节段颈椎间盘置换术(Bryan椎间盘:12例;Prestige LP椎间盘:25例),而另外39例患者接受了单节段ACDF。两组患者的SF-36身体/心理成分评分和NDI评分均有显著改善(p < 0.05);然而,置换术组在每个随访时间点的评分改善均显著更大(p < 0.05)。两组患者在每个时间点的JOA评分和Nurick分级均有显著改善(p < 0.05),但两组之间无显著差异(p > 0.05)。置换术组的活动范围(手术节段和C2C7)保持不变(p > 0.05),而ACDF组则显著降低(p < 0.05)。置换术组的并发症发生率低于ACDF组。颈椎间盘置换术的中期疗效优于ACDF。置换术通过保留活动度避免了脊柱融合的并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验