University of Toledo College of Medicine, Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(9):478-86. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818230.
Noise exposure is a distinct hazard during hand-held concrete grinding activities, and its assessment is challenging because of the many variables involved. Noise dosimeters were used to examine the extent of personal noise exposure while concrete grinding was performed with a variety of grinder sizes, types, accessories, and available dust control methods. Noise monitoring was conducted in an enclosed area covering 52 task-specific grinding sessions lasting from 6 to 72 minutes. Noise levels, either in minute average noise level (Lavg, dBA) or in minute peak (dBC), during concrete grinding were significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with general ventilation (GV: on, off), dust control methods (uncontrolled, wet, Shop-Vac, HEPA, HEPA-Cyclone), grinding cup wheel (blade) sizes of 4-inch (100 mm), 5-inch (125 mm) and 6-inch (150 mm), and surface orientation (horizontal, inclined). Overall, minute Lavg during grinding was 97.0 ± 3.3 (mean ± SD), ranging from 87.9 to 113. The levels of minute Lavg during uncontrolled grinding (98.9 ± 5.2) or wet-grinding (98.5 ± 2.7) were significantly higher than those during local exhaust ventilation (LEV) grinding (96.2 ± 2.8). A 6-inch grinding cup wheel generated significantly higher noise levels (98.7 ± 2.8) than 5-inch (96.3 ± 3.2) or 4-inch (95.3 ± 3.5) cup wheels. The minute peak noise levels (dBC) during grinding was 113 ± 5.2 ranging from 104 to 153. The minute peak noise levels during uncontrolled grinding (119 ± 10.2) were significantly higher than those during wet-grinding (115 ± 4.5) and LEV-grinding (112 ± 3.4). A 6-inch grinding cup wheel generated significantly higher minute peak noise levels (115 ± 5.3) than 5-inch (112 ± 4.5) or 4-inch (111 ± 5.4) cup wheels. Assuming an 8-hour work shift, the results indicated that noise exposure levels during concrete grinding in enclosed areas exceeded the recommended permissible exposure limits and workers should be protected by engineering control methods, safe work practices, and/or personal protective devices.
在手持混凝土研磨作业中,噪声暴露是一个明显的危害,由于涉及到许多变量,因此评估难度很大。使用噪声剂量计检查了在使用各种研磨机尺寸、类型、附件和可用的粉尘控制方法进行混凝土研磨时的个人噪声暴露程度。在一个封闭区域进行了噪声监测,该区域涵盖了 52 个特定研磨任务,持续时间从 6 分钟到 72 分钟不等。在混凝土研磨过程中,无论是分钟平均噪声水平(Lavg,dBA)还是分钟峰值(dBC),噪声水平都与总通风(GV:开、关)、粉尘控制方法(无控制、湿式、Shop-Vac、HEPA、HEPA-Cyclone)、研磨杯轮(叶片)尺寸为 4 英寸(100 毫米)、5 英寸(125 毫米)和 6 英寸(150 毫米)以及表面方向(水平、倾斜)显著相关(P < 0.01)。总体而言,研磨过程中的分钟平均 Lavg 为 97.0 ± 3.3(平均值 ± SD),范围为 87.9 至 113。无控制研磨(98.9 ± 5.2)或湿式研磨(98.5 ± 2.7)期间的分钟 Lavg 水平明显高于局部排气通风(LEV)研磨(96.2 ± 2.8)期间的水平。6 英寸研磨杯轮产生的噪声水平明显高于 5 英寸(96.3 ± 3.2)或 4 英寸(95.3 ± 3.5)杯轮(98.7 ± 2.8)。研磨过程中的分钟峰值噪声水平(dBC)为 113 ± 5.2,范围为 104 至 153。无控制研磨期间的分钟峰值噪声水平(119 ± 10.2)明显高于湿式研磨(115 ± 4.5)和 LEV 研磨(112 ± 3.4)期间的水平。6 英寸研磨杯轮产生的分钟峰值噪声水平明显高于 5 英寸(115 ± 4.5)或 4 英寸(111 ± 5.4)杯轮(115 ± 5.3)。假设工作时间为 8 小时,结果表明,在封闭区域内进行混凝土研磨时的噪声暴露水平超过了推荐的可允许暴露限值,工人应通过工程控制方法、安全工作实践和/或个人防护设备来进行保护。