Department of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43614, USA.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2010 Dec;7(12):700-11. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2010.527552.
Concrete grinding exposes workers to unacceptable levels of crystalline silica dust, known to cause diseases such as silicosis and possibly lung cancer. This study examined the influence of major factors of exposure and effectiveness of existing dust control methods by simulating field concrete grinding in an enclosed workplace laboratory. Air was monitored during 201 concrete grinding sessions while using a variety of grinders, accessories, and existing dust control methods, including general ventilation (GV), local exhaust ventilation (LEV), and wet grinding. Task-specific geometric mean (GM) of respirable crystalline silica dust concentrations (mg/m³ for LEV:HEPA-, LEV:Shop-vac-, wet-, and uncontrolled-grinding, while GV was off/on, were 0.17/0.09, 0.57/0.13, 1.11/0.44, and 23.1/6.80, respectively. Silica dust concentrations (mg/m³ using 100-125 mm (4-5 inch) and 180 mm (7 inch) grinding cups were 0.53/0.22 and 2.43/0.56, respectively. GM concentrations of silica dust were significantly lower for (1) GV on (66.0%) vs. off, and (2) LEV:HEPA- (99.0%), LEV:Shop-vac- (98.1%) or wet- (94.4%) vs. uncontrolled-grinding. Task-specific GM of respirable suspended particulate matter (RSP) concentrations (mg/m³ for LEV:HEPA-, LEV:Shop-vac-, wet-, and uncontrolled grinding, while GV was off/on, were 1.58/0.63, 7.20/1.15, 9.52/4.13, and 152/47.8, respectively. GM concentrations of RSP using 100-125 mm and 180 mm grinding cups were 4.78/1.62 and 22.2/5.06, respectively. GM concentrations of RSP were significantly lower for (1) GV on (70.2%) vs. off, and (2) LEV:HEPA- (98.9%), LEV:Shop-vac- (96.9%) or wet- (92.6%) vs. uncontrolled grinding. Silica dust and RSP were not significantly affected by (1) orientation of grinding surfaces (vertical vs. inclined); (2) water flow rates for wet grinding; (3) length of task-specific sampling time; or, (4) among cup sizes of 100, 115 or 125 mm. No combination of factors or control methods reduced an 8-hr exposure level to below the recommended criterion of 0.025 mg/m³ for crystalline silica, requiring further refinement in engineering controls, administrative controls, or the use of respirators.
混凝土研磨会使工人接触到不可接受水平的结晶二氧化硅粉尘,已知这种粉尘会导致矽肺和可能的肺癌等疾病。本研究通过在封闭的工作场所实验室中模拟现场混凝土研磨,考察了主要暴露因素和现有粉尘控制方法的效果。在使用各种研磨机、附件和现有的粉尘控制方法(包括全面通风(GV)、局部排气通风(LEV)和湿式研磨)进行 201 次混凝土研磨时,监测了空气。当 GV 关闭/打开时,使用 LEV:HEPA-、LEV:Shop-vac-、湿式和未控制研磨的可呼吸结晶二氧化硅粉尘浓度(mg/m³的任务特定几何平均值(GM)分别为 0.17/0.09、0.57/0.13、1.11/0.44 和 23.1/6.80。使用 100-125mm(4-5 英寸)和 180mm(7 英寸)研磨杯时,二氧化硅粉尘浓度(mg/m³)分别为 0.53/0.22 和 2.43/0.56。当 GV 打开(66.0%)与关闭时,以及当使用 LEV:HEPA-(99.0%)、LEV:Shop-vac-(98.1%)或湿式(94.4%)研磨与未控制研磨相比时,二氧化硅粉尘的 GM 浓度显著降低。当 GV 打开(70.2%)与关闭时,以及当使用 LEV:HEPA-(98.9%)、LEV:Shop-vac-(96.9%)或湿式(92.6%)研磨与未控制研磨相比时,可呼吸悬浮颗粒物(RSP)浓度的任务特定 GM (mg/m³)也显著降低。使用 100-125mm 和 180mm 研磨杯时,RSP 的 GM 浓度分别为 4.78/1.62 和 22.2/5.06。RSP 的 GM 浓度不受(1)研磨表面的方向(垂直与倾斜);(2)湿式研磨的水流速率;(3)特定任务采样时间长度;或(4)100、115 或 125mm 杯大小的影响。没有任何因素或控制方法的组合能够将 8 小时暴露水平降低到推荐的 0.025mg/m³以下,因此需要进一步改进工程控制、行政控制或使用呼吸器。