Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7070, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1205-14. doi: 10.1121/1.4812256.
This study compared the dependence of comodulation masking release (CMR) and monaural envelope correlation perception (MECP) on the degree of envelope correlation for the same narrowband noise stimuli. Envelope correlation across noise bands was systematically varied by mixing independent bands with a base set of comodulated bands. The magnitude of CMR fell monotonically with reductions in envelope correlation, and CMR varied over a range of envelope correlations that were not discriminable from each other in the MECP paradigm. For complexes of 100-Hz-wide noise bands, discrimination thresholds in the MECP task were similar whether the standard was a comodulated set of noise bands or a completely independent set of noise bands. This was not the case for 25-Hz-wide noise bands. Although the data demonstrate that CMR and MECP exhibit different dependencies on the degree of envelope correlation, some commonality across the two phenomena was observed. Specifically, for 25-Hz-wide bands of noise, there was a robust relationship between individual listeners' sensitivity to decorrelation from an otherwise comodulated set of noise bands and the magnitude of CMR measured for those same comodulated noise bands.
本研究比较了同一种窄带噪声刺激下,共调掩蔽释放(CMR)和单耳包络相关感知(MECP)对包络相关程度的依赖性。通过将独立的频带与一组基础共调频带混合,系统地改变频带间的包络相关性。CMR 的幅度随包络相关性的降低而单调下降,并且 CMR 在包络相关性范围内变化,在 MECP 范式中彼此无法区分。对于 100Hz 宽噪声频带的复合体,在 MECP 任务中,无论标准是一组共调噪声频带还是一组完全独立的噪声频带,判别阈值都是相似的。25Hz 宽噪声频带的情况则并非如此。尽管数据表明 CMR 和 MECP 对包络相关程度的依赖性不同,但这两种现象之间存在一些共性。具体来说,对于 25Hz 宽的噪声频带,如果从一组共调噪声频带中出现去相关,那么个体听众的敏感性与针对这些相同共调噪声频带测量的 CMR 幅度之间存在很强的关系。