Fantini D A, Moore B C, Schooneveldt G P
MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Apr;93(4 Pt 1):2106-15. doi: 10.1121/1.406697.
Thresholds were measured for detecting a signal centered in a narrow-band noise (NBN) masker (on-frequency band, OFB), for the OFB alone, and with two flanking bands (FBs) added to the OFB, one centered above and one below the OFB. The FBs were either correlated with the OFB or were independent and were presented either to the same ear as the signal plus OFB (monaural condition) or to the opposite ear (dichotic condition). The OFB and FBs were either gated with the signal, or were presented continuously. Three signal types were used: a pure tone; an NBN uncorrelated with the OFB; and an NBN correlated with the OFB. The signal was centered at 0.5, 2, or 6 kHz. Comodulation masking release was estimated either as the difference between threshold with the OFB alone and with the OFB plus correlated FBs [CMR(R-C)], or as the difference between thresholds using correlated and uncorrelated FBs [CMR(U-C)]. Although there were marked individual differences, positive CMR(R-C) values were found in all conditions for all three signal types. CMR(U-C) values were often larger than those for CMR(R-C), reflecting the fact that the uncorrelated FBs tended to produce interference effects, especially for the gated maskers, and at 6 kHz. Values of CMR were larger and more consistent across subjects for continuous than for gated maskers. For continuous maskers, the values of CMR tended to be smallest for the correlated-NBN signal. Results are discussed in terms of available cues and in terms of perceptual grouping mechanisms.
测量了用于检测窄带噪声(NBN)掩蔽器(通带,OFB)中居中信号的阈值,单独测量了OFB的阈值,以及在OFB上添加两个侧翼带(FBs)时的阈值,一个侧翼带位于OFB上方,一个位于OFB下方。FBs要么与OFB相关,要么独立,并且要么与信号加OFB呈现给同一只耳朵(单耳条件),要么呈现给对侧耳朵(双耳条件)。OFB和FBs要么与信号同步开启,要么持续呈现。使用了三种信号类型:纯音;与OFB不相关的NBN;以及与OFB相关的NBN。信号居中于0.5、2或6kHz。共调制掩蔽释放被估计为单独使用OFB时的阈值与使用OFB加相关FBs时的阈值之间的差异[CMR(R-C)],或者作为使用相关和不相关FBs时阈值之间的差异[CMR(U-C)]。尽管存在明显的个体差异,但在所有条件下,所有三种信号类型都发现了正的CMR(R-C)值。CMR(U-C)值通常大于CMR(R-C)值,这反映了不相关的FBs往往会产生干扰效应,尤其是对于同步开启的掩蔽器,以及在6kHz时。与同步开启的掩蔽器相比,连续掩蔽器的CMR值在受试者之间更大且更一致。对于连续掩蔽器,相关NBN信号的CMR值往往最小。将根据可用线索和感知分组机制对结果进行讨论。