Centre for Language and Speech Technology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, 6525HT, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1336-47. doi: 10.1121/1.4813304.
This research is aimed at analyzing and improving automatic pronunciation error detection in a second language. Dutch vowels spoken by adult non-native learners of Dutch are used as a test case. A first study on Dutch pronunciation by L2 learners with different L1s revealed that vowel pronunciation errors are relatively frequent and often concern subtle acoustic differences between the realization and the target sound. In a second study automatic pronunciation error detection experiments were conducted to compare existing measures to a metric that takes account of the error patterns observed to capture relevant acoustic differences. The results of the two studies do indeed show that error patterns bear information that can be usefully employed in weighted automatic measures of pronunciation quality. In addition, it appears that combining such a weighted metric with existing measures improves the equal error rate by 6.1 percentage points from 0.297, for the Goodness of Pronunciation (GOP) algorithm, to 0.236.
本研究旨在分析和改进第二语言自动发音错误检测。以荷兰成年非母语学习者所说的荷兰语元音为例进行测试。对来自不同母语背景的第二语言学习者的荷兰语发音的初步研究表明,元音发音错误相对频繁,而且通常涉及到目标音实现与目标音之间的细微声学差异。在第二项研究中,进行了自动发音错误检测实验,以比较现有的度量方法和一种考虑到所观察到的错误模式的度量方法,以捕捉相关的声学差异。这两项研究的结果确实表明,错误模式确实提供了有用的信息,可以在发音质量的加权自动度量中使用。此外,似乎将这种加权度量与现有的度量方法相结合,可以将发音质量算法(GOP)的等错误率从 0.297 提高 6.1 个百分点,达到 0.236。