From the Denver Health Medical Center/University of Colorado (E.E.M.), Denver, Colorado; San Francisco General Hospital/University of California (M.A.W.), San Francisco, California; University of Florida (F.A.M.), Gainesville, Florida; University of California (J.W.D.), San Francisco--Fresno, California; University of California--Davis Medical Center (C.C.), Sacramento, Califonia; R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center/University of Maryland (T.M.S.), Baltimore, Maryland; and University of Colorado (R.C.M.), Denver, Colorado.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):391-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182994b48.
This is a position article from members of the Western Trauma Association (WTA). Because there are no prospective randomized trials on the evaluation and management of peripheral vascular trauma, the algorithm is based on the expert opinion of the WTA members and published observational studies. It may not be applicable at all hospitals caring for injured patients. The algorithm contains letters that correspond to lettered text that is intentionally concise. This Part II algorithm focuses on operative techniques, while the Part I algorithm (J Trauma 2011;70: 1551-1556) emphasized evaluation, diagnosis, and need for operation versus a therapeutic procedure performed in an interventional suite.
这是一篇来自西方创伤协会(WTA)成员的立场文章。由于对外周血管创伤的评估和管理尚无前瞻性随机试验,因此该算法基于 WTA 成员的专家意见和已发表的观察性研究。它可能并不适用于所有收治创伤患者的医院。该算法包含与有意简洁的字母文本相对应的字母。本第二部分算法侧重于手术技术,而第一部分算法(J Trauma 2011;70:1551-1556)则强调评估、诊断以及是否需要手术与在介入室进行的治疗程序。