• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国诊断相关分组系统中急诊室患者的成本分析。基于临床参数的实践相关描述]

[Cost analysis of emergency room patients in the German diagnosis-related groups system. A practice relevant depiction subject to clinical parameters].

作者信息

Garving C, Santosa D, Bley C, Pape H-C

机构信息

Abteilung für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie - Schwerpunkt Unfallchirurgie, Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland,

出版信息

Unfallchirurg. 2014 Aug;117(8):716-22. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2405-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-013-2405-2
PMID:23928797
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the implementation of the diagnosis-related system there has been a continuous lack of finances in the treatment of multiple injured patients. The current investigation summarizes consecutive patients from a level I trauma centre and tests the hypothesis that an injury severity score (ISS) based reimbursement would be an improvement in the cost-effectiveness of this patient population.

METHODS

The study is based on multiple injured patients admitted to the emergency department in 2009. The ISS, intensive care unit (ICU) stay and cost data were recorded for every patient and two subgroups were formed: group I ISS < 16 and group II ISS ≥ 16.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients with an average age of 40.5 ± 9.1 years (ISS 12) were included. The average amount of coverage during an average length of stay of 13.15 ± 6.3 was -2,752 per patient. Patients in group I (n = 296, ISS 6.3) showed a value of -1,163 with an average length of stay of 8 ± 4.6 days. In group II (n = 146, ISS 23.6) the average amount of coverage was -5,973 during an average hospital stay of 23 ± 8.7 days.

CONCLUSION

Improvements have been made with the recent adjustment of the reimbursement within the last year. Nevertheless, several factors identified in this study require additional adjustment: the ISS, the requirement of blood transfusion and the presence of additional chest trauma should be weighted in the calculation of reimbursement.

摘要

背景

自实施诊断相关系统以来,在治疗多发伤患者方面一直存在资金持续短缺的情况。本研究总结了来自一级创伤中心的连续患者,并检验了基于损伤严重度评分(ISS)的报销方式将提高该患者群体成本效益的假设。

方法

本研究基于2009年入住急诊科的多发伤患者。记录每位患者的ISS、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和成本数据,并形成两个亚组:I组ISS<16和II组ISS≥16。

结果

共纳入442例患者,平均年龄40.5±9.1岁(ISS为12)。在平均住院时间13.15±6.3天期间,每位患者的平均覆盖金额为-2752欧元。I组患者(n = 296,ISS为6.3)的数值为-1163欧元,平均住院时间为8±4.6天。II组(n = 146,ISS为23.6)在平均住院23±8.7天期间的平均覆盖金额为-5973欧元。

结论

去年报销政策的近期调整已取得一些改进。然而,本研究中确定的几个因素需要进一步调整:在报销计算中应权衡ISS、输血需求和是否存在额外的胸部创伤。

相似文献

1
[Cost analysis of emergency room patients in the German diagnosis-related groups system. A practice relevant depiction subject to clinical parameters].[德国诊断相关分组系统中急诊室患者的成本分析。基于临床参数的实践相关描述]
Unfallchirurg. 2014 Aug;117(8):716-22. doi: 10.1007/s00113-013-2405-2.
2
[The cost estimator in the TraumaRegister DGU].[创伤登记数据库DGU中的成本估算器]
Unfallchirurg. 2017 Dec;120(12):1065-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00113-016-0266-1.
3
[DRG reimbursement for multiple trauma patients -- a comparison with the comprehensive hospital costs using the German trauma registry].[德国创伤登记处对多发伤患者的疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)报销——与综合医院费用的比较]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jan;107(1):68-75. doi: 10.1007/s00113-003-0715-5.
4
[Costs for acute, stationary treatment of polytrauma patients].[多发伤患者急性、固定治疗的费用]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Nov;105(11):1043-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0524-2.
5
[Is polytrauma affordable these days? G-DRG system vs per diem charge based on 1,030 patients with multiple injuries].如今多发伤的治疗费用负担得起吗?基于1030例多发伤患者的德国诊断相关分组(G-DRG)系统与每日收费对比
Unfallchirurg. 2012 Oct;115(10):892-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1920-7.
6
[Cost analysis of primary care and intensive care treatment of multiple trauma patients].[多发伤患者初级护理与重症监护治疗的成本分析]
Unfallchirurg. 1997 Jan;100(1):44-9. doi: 10.1007/s001130050094.
7
[Classification of severely injured patients in the G-DRG System 2008].[2008年德国诊断相关分组系统中重伤患者的分类]
Unfallchirurg. 2009 May;112(5):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-009-1570-9.
8
[Definition of polytrauma in the German DRG system 2006. Up to 30% "incorrect classifications"].[2006年德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统中多发伤的定义。高达30%的“错误分类”]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jul;110(7):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1300-0.
9
A quantitative method for cost reimbursement and length of stay quality assurance in multiple trauma patients.一种用于多发伤患者费用报销及住院时间质量保证的定量方法。
J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):928-37. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00010.
10
[Is multiple trauma currently affordable?].[目前多发性创伤的治疗费用负担得起吗?]
Unfallchirurg. 2012 May;115(5):467-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-2083-x.

引用本文的文献

1
No trauma-related diagnosis in emergency trauma room whole-body computer tomography of patients with inconspicuous primary survey.急诊创伤室全身计算机断层扫描患者在初次检查中无明显创伤相关诊断。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1783-1790. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02511-0. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
[Analysis of a differentiated resuscitation room activation at a national trauma center].[国家创伤中心差异化复苏室启动情况分析]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;127(4):290-296. doi: 10.1007/s00113-023-01391-0. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
3
[Emergency room and major trauma treatment is a "loss-making business" : A Swiss trauma center experience with current DRG reimbursement].

本文引用的文献

1
[Classification of severely injured patients in the G-DRG System 2008].[2008年德国诊断相关分组系统中重伤患者的分类]
Unfallchirurg. 2009 May;112(5):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00113-009-1570-9.
2
[Definition of polytrauma in the German DRG system 2006. Up to 30% "incorrect classifications"].[2006年德国疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统中多发伤的定义。高达30%的“错误分类”]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jul;110(7):651-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-007-1300-0.
3
[Evaluation of costs incurred for patients with multiple trauma particularly from the perspective of the hospital].
[急诊室与重大创伤治疗是一项“亏本生意”:一家瑞士创伤中心在当前疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)报销制度下的经历]
Unfallchirurg. 2021 Sep;124(9):747-754. doi: 10.1007/s00113-020-00937-w. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
[对多发伤患者所产生费用的评估,尤其是从医院角度出发]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Jul;107(7):563-74. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0778-y.
4
[The development of a model to calculate the cost of care for the severely injured--an initiative of the Trauma Register of the DGU].[一种用于计算重伤患者护理成本的模型的开发——德国创伤外科学会创伤登记处的一项倡议]
Unfallchirurg. 2003 Apr;106(4):348-57. doi: 10.1007/s00113-003-0605-x.
5
[Cost analysis of the treatment of patients with multiple trauma].[多发性创伤患者治疗的成本分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2000 Aug;103(8):632-9. doi: 10.1007/s001130050596.
6
[The epidemiology of multiple trauma].[多发性创伤的流行病学]
Chirurg. 1997 Nov;68(11):1053-8. doi: 10.1007/s001040050322.
7
A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring.一种对损伤严重程度评分的改进,既能提高准确性又能简化评分。
J Trauma. 1997 Dec;43(6):922-5; discussion 925-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00009.
8
[Cost analysis of clinical treatment of polytrauma patients].[多发伤患者临床治疗的成本分析]
Chirurg. 1995 Jul;66(7):684-92.
9
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.损伤严重度评分:一种描述多发伤患者及评估急诊治疗的方法。
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96.