Department of Surgery, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, USA.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Sep;56(9):1053-61. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318293eabc.
Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of colon cancer has been widely adopted in community practice, in part, because of shorter hospitalizations. The benefits of a shorter hospital stay are only realized if readmissions and emergency department visits, collectively termed revisits, do not increase after discharge. We conducted a population-based analysis to determine whether hospitals with higher laparoscopic colectomy rates have higher revisit rates.
The aim of this study was to determine whether hospital utilization after discharge is increased for patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.
This is a retrospective cohort study.
Data were gathered from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's inpatient and emergency department databases for California. These databases include data from all nonfederal hospitals in the State of California.
Patients who underwent elective colectomy for cancer from 2008 to 2009 were included.
The primary intervention was elective colectomy with the use of the open or laparoscopic approach.
The correlation between hospital laparoscopy rates and hospital readmission rates, emergency department visit rates, and revisit rates was calculated.
Overall, 6760 patients were treated at 176 hospitals. For every 100 patients discharged, there were 14.0 readmissions and 9.2 emergency department encounters. At the hospital level, laparoscopy rates varied considerably (median = 45.7%, range = 2.2%-88.9%), as did the risk-standardized readmission (12.1%, 8.6%-16.5%), emergency department encounter (7.8%, 4.1%-18.0%), and revisit rates (17.9%, 13.0%-26.4%). A hospital's laparoscopy rate was not significantly correlated with its risk-standardized readmission (weighted correlation coefficient = 0.05, p = 0.50), emergency department encounter (-0.11, p = 0.16), or revisit (-0.03, p = 0.70) rates.
There are inherent limitations when using administrative data.
Hospitals where a greater proportion of colon resections for cancer are approached laparoscopically do not have higher 30-day, risk-standardized readmission, emergency department encounter, or revisit rates.
腹腔镜结肠切除术已被广泛应用于社区实践中,以治疗结肠癌,部分原因是住院时间更短。只有在出院后,再次入院和急诊就诊(统称为复诊)没有增加的情况下,住院时间的缩短才会带来好处。我们进行了一项基于人群的分析,以确定腹腔镜结直肠切除术率较高的医院是否具有更高的复诊率。
本研究旨在确定接受腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的患者出院后的医院利用情况是否增加。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
数据来自加利福尼亚州医疗保健成本和利用项目的住院和急诊数据库。这些数据库包括加利福尼亚州所有非联邦医院的数据。
纳入 2008 年至 2009 年接受择期结肠癌切除术的患者。
主要干预措施是开放性或腹腔镜结直肠切除术。
计算医院腹腔镜使用率与医院再入院率、急诊就诊率和复诊率的相关性。
共有 6760 例患者在 176 家医院接受治疗。每 100 名出院患者中,有 14.0 例再入院和 9.2 例急诊就诊。在医院层面,腹腔镜使用率差异很大(中位数为 45.7%,范围为 2.2%-88.9%),风险标准化再入院率(12.1%,8.6%-16.5%)、急诊就诊率(7.8%,4.1%-18.0%)和复诊率(17.9%,13.0%-26.4%)也不同。医院的腹腔镜使用率与风险标准化再入院率(加权相关系数=0.05,p=0.50)、急诊就诊率(-0.11,p=0.16)或复诊率(-0.03,p=0.70)均无显著相关性。
使用行政数据存在固有局限性。
接受腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术的比例较高的医院,其 30 天风险标准化再入院率、急诊就诊率或复诊率并无更高。