Godoy Carlos Eduardo, Antunes Armando, Morais Sirlei Siani, Pinto-Neto Aarão Mendes, Costa-Paiva Lucia
Departamento de Tocoginecologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas-Unicamp-Campinas (SP), Brasil.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013 Jun;35(6):243-8. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032013000600002.
To evaluate the accuracy of sonographic endometrial thickness and hysteroscopic characteristics in predicting malignancy in postmenopausal women undergoing surgical resection of endometrial polyps.
Five hundred twenty-one (521) postmenopausal women undergoing hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps between January 1998 and December 2008 were studied. For each value of sonographic endometrial thickness and polyp size on hysteroscopy, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated in relation to the histologic diagnosis of malignancy. The best values of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignancy were determined by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.
Histologic diagnosis identified the presence of premalignancy or malignancy in 4.1% of cases. Sonographic measurement revealed a greater endometrial thickness in cases of malignant polyps when compared to benign and premalignant polyps. On surgical hysteroscopy, malignant endometrial polyps were also larger. An endometrial thickness of 13 mm showed a sensitivity of 69.6%, specificity of 68.5%, PPV of 9.3%, and NPV of 98% in predicting malignancy in endometrial polyps. Polyp measurement by hysteroscopy showed that for polyps 30 mm in size, the sensitivity was 47.8%, specificity was 66.1%, PPV was 6.1%, and NPV was 96.5% for predicting cancer.
Sonographic endometrial thickness showed a higher level of accuracy than hysteroscopic measurement in predicting malignancy in endometrial polyps. Despite this, both techniques showed low accuracy for predicting malignancy in endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women. In suspected cases, histologic evaluation is necessary to exclude malignancy.
评估超声测量子宫内膜厚度及宫腔镜检查特征对绝经后接受子宫内膜息肉手术切除患者恶性病变的预测准确性。
对1998年1月至2008年12月间接受宫腔镜下子宫内膜息肉切除术的521例绝经后女性进行研究。针对超声测量的子宫内膜厚度及宫腔镜检查时息肉大小的每个数值,计算其与恶性病变组织学诊断相关的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线确定诊断恶性病变的最佳灵敏度和特异度值。
组织学诊断发现4.1%的病例存在癌前病变或恶性病变。超声测量显示,与良性和癌前息肉相比,恶性息肉的子宫内膜厚度更大。在手术宫腔镜检查中,恶性子宫内膜息肉也更大。子宫内膜厚度为13 mm时,预测子宫内膜息肉恶性病变的灵敏度为69.6%,特异度为68.5%,PPV为9.3%,NPV为98%。宫腔镜检查测量息肉大小显示,对于大小为30 mm的息肉,预测癌症的灵敏度为47.8%,特异度为66.1%,PPV为6.1%,NPV为96.5%。
在预测子宫内膜息肉恶性病变方面,超声测量子宫内膜厚度比宫腔镜检查测量的准确性更高。尽管如此,两种技术在预测绝经后女性子宫内膜息肉恶性病变方面的准确性均较低。在疑似病例中,需要进行组织学评估以排除恶性病变。