• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁买的饮料?强奸案审判中陪审员对醉酒的感知。

Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.

机构信息

University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(16):3205-22. doi: 10.1177/0886260513496900. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1177/0886260513496900
PMID:23929601
Abstract

In this study, the perceptions of victim intoxication and the drinking context (i.e., who purchased the drinks) were investigated. Men and women mock jurors (N = 158) read a rape trial summary in which the victim was intoxicated or sober, and either the victim or the perpetrator purchased the drinks. Overall, participants who perceived a victim as intoxicated were less likely to render guilty verdicts and made lower ratings of victim credibility. In addition, when the perpetrator purchased the drinks, participants were more likely to render guilty verdicts and made more negative judgments about the defendant than when the victim bought the drinks. Mediation analyses explained the relationship between the independent variables and verdict. The results are discussed in terms of the factors that influence juror perceptions of rape cases in court.

摘要

在这项研究中,调查了受害者醉酒程度和饮酒情境(即谁购买了饮料)的感知。男性和女性模拟陪审员(N=158)阅读了一份强奸案审判摘要,其中受害者醉酒或清醒,购买饮料的是受害者或施害者。总的来说,认为受害者醉酒的参与者更不可能做出有罪判决,并且对受害者的可信度评价较低。此外,当施害者购买饮料时,与受害者购买饮料时相比,参与者更有可能做出有罪判决,并对被告做出更负面的判断。中介分析解释了自变量与判决之间的关系。结果根据影响法庭上陪审员对强奸案件看法的因素进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.谁买的饮料?强奸案审判中陪审员对醉酒的感知。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(16):3205-22. doi: 10.1177/0886260513496900. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
2
Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault-Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame.受审的强奸犯:性侵犯相关图式对罪责归因的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Jan;34(2):310-336. doi: 10.1177/0886260516640777. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Impacts of Victim Resistance and Type of Assault on Legal Decision-Making in Child Sexual Assault.儿童性侵犯中受害者抵抗和攻击类型对法律决策的影响。
J Child Sex Abus. 2023 May;32(4):418-437. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2023.2180468. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.模拟陪审员对大学校园性侵犯的看法。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. doi: 10.1177/0886260518800316. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
5
Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: is there a double standard?在强奸和抢劫案件中,指责受害者而开脱施害者:是否存在双重标准?
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jun;26(9):1785-97. doi: 10.1177/0886260510372945. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
6
Mock Juror Perceptions of Rape Victims: Impact of Case Characteristics and Individual Differences.模拟陪审员对强奸受害者的认知:案件特征和个体差异的影响
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Oct;31(17):2847-66. doi: 10.1177/0886260515581907. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
7
Impeaching Rape Victims in Criminal Court: Does Concurrent Civil Action Hurt Justice?
J Interpers Violence. 2016 Nov;31(19):3129-3149. doi: 10.1177/0886260515584342. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
8
The effect of victim information on causality judgments in a rape trial scenario.强奸审判场景中受害者信息对因果关系判断的影响。
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Aug;149(4):495-512. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.4.495-512.
9
The Effects of Victim Gender Identity, Juror Gender, and Judicial Instructions on Victim Blaming, Crime Severity Ratings, and Verdicts in Sexual Assault Trials.受害者性别认同、陪审员性别及司法指示对性侵审判中受害者归咎、犯罪严重程度评级和判决的影响
J Homosex. 2023 May 12;70(6):1187-1224. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2021.2018877. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Big girls don't cry: the effect of child witness demeanor on juror decisions in a child sexual abuse trial.大女孩不哭:儿童证人的举止对儿童性虐待审判中陪审员裁决的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Nov;27(11):1311-21. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.03.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Multiple Perpetrator Rape in the Courtroom.法庭上对多人实施强奸的认知。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;15(7):844. doi: 10.3390/bs15070844.
2
"I'll Be That One Cockblocking Friend": Understanding Student Experiences of Bystander Intervention in Alcohol-Related Sexual Assault.“我会成为那个阻碍好事的朋友”:理解学生在与酒精相关的性侵犯中旁观者干预的经历
J Sex Res. 2024 Oct 21:1-14. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2417026.
3
Would you believe an intoxicated witness? The impact of witness alcohol intoxication status on credibility judgments and suggestibility.
你会相信一个醉酒的证人吗?证人酒精中毒状态对可信度判断和易受暗示性的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 30;13:983681. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.983681. eCollection 2022.
4
An experimental examination of the effects of alcohol consumption and exposure to misleading postevent information on remembering a hypothetical rape scenario.一项关于饮酒以及接触误导性事件后信息对回忆一个假设的强奸场景的影响的实验研究。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2019 May-Jun;33(3):393-413. doi: 10.1002/acp.3531. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
Women's Experiences of Impairment and Incapacitation During Alcohol/Drug-Related Sexual Assaults: Toward a Survivor-Informed Approach to Measurement.女性在酒精/药物相关性侵事件中的损伤和丧失能力的体验:走向以幸存者为中心的测量方法。
Arch Sex Behav. 2019 Oct;48(7):2105-2116. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-1441-6. Epub 2019 Jul 20.