Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1C7, Canada.
Hippocampus. 2013 Nov;23(11):1075-83. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22179.
The conditioned cue preference paradigm was used to study how rats use extra-maze cues to discriminate between 2 adjacent arms on an 8-arm radial maze, a situation in which most of the same cues can be seen from both arms but only one arm contains food. Since the food-restricted rats eat while passively confined on the food-paired arm no responses are reinforced, so the discrimination is due to Pavlovian stimulus-reward (or outcome) learning. Consistent with other evidence that rats must move around in an environment to acquire a spatial map, we found that learning the adjacent arms CCP (ACCP) required a minimum amount of active exploration of the maze with no reinforcers present prior to passive pairing of the extra-maze cues with the food reinforcer, an instance of latent learning. Temporary inactivation of the hippocampus during the pre-exposure sessions had no effect on ACCP learning, confirming other evidence that the hippocampus is not involved in latent learning. A series of experiments indentified a circuit involving fimbria-fornix and dorsal entorhinal cortex as the neural basis of latent learning in this situation. In contrast, temporary inactivation of the entorhinal cortex or hippocampus during passive training or during testing blocked ACCP learning and expression, respectively, suggesting that these two structures co-operate in using spatial information to learn the location of food on the maze during passive pairing and to express this combined information during testing. In parallel with these processes we found that the amygdala processes information leading to an equal tendency to enter both adjacent arms (even though only one was paired with food) suggesting that the stimulus information available to this structure is not sufficiently precise to discriminate between the ambiguous cues visible from the adjacent arms. Expression of the ACCP in normal rats depends on hippocampus-based learning to avoid the unpaired arm which competes with the amygdala-based tendency to enter that arm. In contrast, there is cooperation between amygdala- and hippocampus-based tendencies to enter the food-paired arm. These independent forms of learning contribute to the rat's ability to discriminate among spatial locations using ambiguous extra-maze cues.
条件线索偏好范式被用于研究大鼠如何使用额外的迷宫线索来区分 8 臂放射状迷宫的 2 个相邻臂,在这种情况下,大多数相同的线索可以从两个臂看到,但只有一个臂包含食物。由于受限制进食的大鼠在与食物配对的臂上被动限制时进食,因此没有强化反应,因此这种辨别是由于巴甫洛夫的刺激-奖励(或结果)学习。与其他证据一致,即大鼠必须在环境中移动才能获得空间地图,我们发现学习相邻臂的条件线索偏好(ACCP)需要在没有强化物的情况下,对迷宫进行最低限度的主动探索,然后将额外的迷宫线索与食物强化物被动配对,这是一种潜在学习的实例。在预暴露期间暂时失活海马体对 ACCP 学习没有影响,这证实了其他证据,即海马体不参与潜在学习。一系列实验确定了一个涉及穹窿伞-海马伞和背侧内嗅皮层的回路作为这种情况下潜在学习的神经基础。相比之下,在被动训练期间或在测试期间暂时失活内嗅皮层或海马体分别阻止了 ACCP 的学习和表达,这表明这两个结构在被动配对期间合作使用空间信息来学习迷宫上食物的位置,并在测试期间表达这种综合信息。与这些过程平行,我们发现杏仁核处理导致进入两个相邻臂的平等倾向的信息(即使只有一个与食物配对),这表明该结构可用的刺激信息不够精确,无法区分来自相邻臂的模糊线索。正常大鼠的 ACCP 表达取决于基于海马体的学习,以避免进入与杏仁核基于倾向进入该臂竞争的未配对臂。相比之下,进入食物配对臂的杏仁核和海马体基于倾向之间存在合作。这些独立的学习形式有助于大鼠使用模糊的额外迷宫线索来区分空间位置。