• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

>500g 子宫大小的经阴道全子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术结局和成本比较。

Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym Universitiy, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hallym University, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.013
PMID:23932973
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes and overall costs of less invasive methods of hysterectomy to treat benign disease including total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in women with a uterus weighing >500 g.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical records (Canadian Task Force classification III).

SETTING

University-associated hospital.

PATIENTS

One hundred three women with a uterus weighing >500 g who had undergone either total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) (n = 52) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) (n = 51).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cost data were extracted from the hospital billing system. Patient characteristics, surgical outcomes, and hospital costs were compared between the 2 groups. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups except for a history of surgery (TVH 11.5%, and TLH 37.3%; p = .01). Insofar as surgical outcomes, mean (SD) operative time was shorter in the TVH group compared with the TLH group (110.00 [28.68] minutes vs 180.47 [51.32] minutes; p < .001), and hospital stay was longer (8.08 [0.68] days vs 7.45 [1.03] days; p < .001). Other surgical outcomes including estimated blood loss (p = .20) and decrease in hemoglobin (p = .12) did not differ between the 2 groups. Total hospital costs (converted from Korean won to US dollars) were significantly lower in the TVH group than in the TLH group ($2076.59 [$666.58] vs $2744.03 [$715.76]; p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that TVH is a safe and economic procedure even in women with a uterus weighing >500 g. Skilled surgeons should preferentially consider TVH for treatment of benign uterine disease, regardless of uterine size.

摘要

研究目的

比较治疗良性疾病的微创手术方法(包括经阴道全子宫切除术(TVH)和全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH))与全子宫切除术(TVH)的手术结果和总体成本。

设计

病历回顾(加拿大任务组分类 III)。

地点

大学附属医院。

患者

103 名子宫重量超过 500 克的妇女,其中 52 名接受了经阴道全子宫切除术(TVH),51 名接受了全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)。

测量和主要结果

从医院计费系统中提取成本数据。比较两组患者的特征、手术结果和医院费用。两组患者的特征相似,除了手术史(TVH 11.5%,TLH 37.3%;p =.01)。就手术结果而言,TVH 组的平均(SD)手术时间短于 TLH 组(110.00 [28.68] 分钟比 180.47 [51.32] 分钟;p <.001),住院时间较长(8.08 [0.68] 天比 7.45 [1.03] 天;p <.001)。两组之间其他手术结果(包括估计失血量[p =.20]和血红蛋白下降[p =.12])无差异。TVH 组的总住院费用(韩元换算成美元)明显低于 TLH 组(2076.59 [666.58] 美元比 2744.03 [715.76] 美元;p <.001)。

结论

即使在子宫重量超过 500 克的妇女中,TVH 也是一种安全且经济的手术方法。有经验的外科医生应优先考虑 TVH 治疗良性子宫疾病,而不论子宫大小。

相似文献

1
Surgical outcome and cost comparison between total vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing >500 g.>500g 子宫大小的经阴道全子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术结局和成本比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):115-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
2
Comparison of clinical effects between total vaginal hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy on large uteruses over 300 grams.300克以上大子宫行全阴道子宫切除术与全腹腔镜子宫切除术的临床效果比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010 Jun;36(3):656-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01185.x.
3
Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy.经阴道全子宫切除术与其他微创手术的医院费用比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;210(2):120.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
4
Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.系统实施腹腔镜子宫切除术与子宫大小无关:临床效果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):505-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.009.
5
[Clinical comparison of transvaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy].经阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的临床比较
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Oct;40(10):656-8.
6
Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.经阴道与经腹子宫切除术治疗非脱垂性子宫增大:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
7
Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital.大学教学医院进行的腹部、阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除术的观察性比较。
J Reprod Med. 2006 Dec;51(12):945-54.
8
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with uterine artery ligation through retrograde umbilical ligament tracking.经逆行脐韧带追踪行子宫动脉结扎的腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):336-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.006.
9
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与全阴道子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.经阴道与腹腔镜子宫骶骨固定术时的围手术期发病率的全国性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.05.015. Epub 2020 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to Hysterectomy-What Is the Realistic Rate for Pure Vaginal Hysterectomy? A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.子宫切除术的可及性——单纯经阴道子宫切除术的实际比例是多少?一项单中心前瞻性观察性研究。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):6130. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206130.
2
Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy.腹腔镜与经阴道手术治疗良性子宫切除术后的医疗保健和间接成本。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00048.
3
The Large Uterus Classification System: a prospective observational study.
《大子宫分类系统:一项前瞻性观察研究》。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1526-1533. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16753. Epub 2021 Jun 8.