UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:1071-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
Government funding to protect native plant communities is usually limited. For cost effectiveness, priority sites for conservation must therefore be identified and funds allocated to protect these sites according to the quantity of communities conserved per dollar of cost. In 1999, invasion of coastal vegetation in New South Wales (NSW) by bitou bush was listed as a key threatening process under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. In accordance with the Act, a Threat Abatement Plan (TAP) was prepared to reduce the impacts of the weed to threatened biodiversity at priority sites. In the present study, data collected for the TAP were analysed by linear programming to determine the feasibility of achieving cost effectiveness in identifying sites and allocating funds, and to explore the impact of associated economic issues on the quantity of native plant communities that are protected. In addition to the total funds and costs per site, the quantity was influenced by alternative funding policies and different site selection strategies. Allocations that recognise these issues can enhance protection outcomes, and promote the cost effectiveness of weed management.
政府用于保护本地植物群落的资金通常是有限的。因此,为了达到成本效益,必须确定保护的优先地点,并根据每美元成本保护的群落数量来分配资金用于保护这些地点。1999 年,新南威尔士州(NSW)的海滨植被被 Bitou bush 入侵,被列为新南威尔士州濒危物种保护法 1995 年的关键威胁过程。根据该法案,制定了威胁缓解计划(TAP),以减少杂草对优先地点受威胁生物多样性的影响。在本研究中,通过线性规划对 TAP 收集的数据进行了分析,以确定在确定地点和分配资金方面实现成本效益的可行性,并探讨相关经济问题对受保护本地植物群落数量的影响。除了每个地点的总资金和成本外,数量还受到替代资金政策和不同选址策略的影响。认识到这些问题的分配可以增强保护效果,并提高杂草管理的成本效益。