Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):499-507. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351123. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
The overarching goal of positive pressure mechanical ventilation is to provide adequate gas exchange support while not causing harm. Indeed, positive pressure mechanical ventilators are only support technologies, not therapeutic technologies. As such they cannot be expected to "cure" disease; they can only "buy time" for other therapies (including the patient's own defenses) to work.Conventional approaches to positive pressure ventilation involve applying ventilatory patterns mimicking normal ones through either masks or artificial airways. This is usually done with modes of support incorporating assist/control breath-triggering mechanisms, gas delivery patterns governed by either a set flow or pressure, and breath cycling based on either a set volume, a set inspiratory time, or a set flow. Often this support includes positive end-expiratory pressure and supplemental oxygen. In recent decades several novel or unconventional approaches to providing mechanical ventilatory support have been introduced. For these to be considered of value, however, it would seem reasonable that they address important clinical challenges and be shown to improve important clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, duration of ventilation, sedation needs, complications). This article focuses on challenges facing clinicians in providing mechanical ventilatory support and assesses several novel approaches introduced over the last 2 decades in the context of these challenges.
正压机械通气的总体目标是提供足够的气体交换支持,同时不造成伤害。事实上,正压呼吸机只是支持技术,而不是治疗技术。因此,不能期望它们能“治愈”疾病;它们只能为其他治疗方法(包括患者自身的防御机制)争取时间。
传统的正压通气方法包括通过面罩或人工气道应用模拟正常通气模式的通气模式。这通常是通过带有辅助/控制呼吸触发机制的支持模式来实现的,通气模式由设定的流量或压力控制,呼吸循环基于设定的容量、设定的吸气时间或设定的流量。通常这种支持包括呼气末正压和补充氧气。在最近几十年,已经引入了几种提供机械通气支持的新方法或非常规方法。然而,为了使其具有价值,似乎合理的是,它们应该解决重要的临床挑战,并显示出改善重要的临床结果(例如,死亡率、通气时间、镇静需求、并发症)。本文重点介绍了临床医生在提供机械通气支持方面面临的挑战,并根据这些挑战评估了过去 20 年中引入的几种新方法。