Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Aug;34(4):516-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351120. Epub 2013 Aug 11.
The evolution of scientific investigation in acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is replete with examples of effective bench-to-bedside transitions, pioneering research methodology, and international collaboration. This article highlights for clinicians a selection of challenges and controversies of clinical trial design in ALI and ARDS. A section on Patient Selection highlights controversial trade-offs between homogeneous and heterogeneous study populations. A section on Clinical Protocols covers blinding, process-of-care interventions, usual-care control groups, and standardized protocols for adjunctive care. The third section discusses the quest for ideal Study Outcomes. The final section presents Interpretation Controversies, such as early stopping of clinical trials.
急性肺损伤(ALI)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的科学研究进展充满了有效的从实验室到临床的转化、开创性的研究方法和国际合作的例子。本文为临床医生重点介绍了 ALI 和 ARDS 临床试验设计中的一些挑战和争议。患者选择部分强调了在同质和异质研究人群之间存在有争议的权衡取舍。临床方案部分涵盖了盲法、治疗干预、常规护理对照组以及辅助治疗的标准化方案。第三部分讨论了寻找理想的研究结果的问题。最后一部分介绍了一些解释上的争议,例如临床试验的提前终止。