Institut für Pathophysiologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany;
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Oct 15;305(8):H1222-9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00358.2013. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
Stent implantation into atherosclerotic coronary arteries releases particulate debris and soluble substances that contribute to impaired microvascular perfusion. Here we addressed the potential for microvascular obstruction in patients with stenotic native right coronary arteries (nRCA) compared with saphenous vein grafts on right coronary arteries (SVG-RCA). We enrolled symptomatic, male patients with stable angina pectoris and a flow-limiting stenosis in their nRCA or SVG-RCA (n = 18/18). Plaque volume and composition were analyzed using intravascular ultrasound before stent implantation. Coronary aspirate was retrieved during stent implantation under protection with a distal occlusion/aspiration device and divided into particulate debris and plasma. The release of catecholamines, endothelin, serotonin, thromboxane B2, and tumor necrosis factor-α was measured. The response of rat mesenteric arteries with intact (+E) and denuded (-E) endothelium to aspirate plasma (without and with selective endothelin receptor blockade) was normalized to that by potassium chloride (KClmax = 100%). Plaque volume and composition were not different between nRCA and SVG-RCA. There was less particulate debris (65 ± 8 vs. 146 ± 23 mg; P < 0.05) and more endothelin release (5.8 ± 0.8 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7 pg/ml; P < 0.05) in nRCA than in SVG-RCA, whereas the release of the other mediators was not different. Aspirate from nRCA induced stronger vasoconstriction than that from SVG-RCA [nRCA, 78 ± 6% (+E)/84 ± 5% (-E); SVG-RCA, 59 ± 6% (+E)/68 ± 3% (-E); P < 0.05 nRCA vs. SVG-RCA], which was attenuated by a nonspecific endothelin and a specific endothelin receptor A antagonist. Thus coronary aspirate from stented nRCA is characterized by less debris but more endothelin and stronger vasoconstrictor response than that from SVG-RCA.
支架植入到动脉粥样硬化的冠状动脉会释放出颗粒状碎片和可溶性物质,这些物质会导致微血管灌注受损。在这里,我们比较了狭窄的右冠状动脉(nRCA)内支架植入患者与右冠状动脉(SVG-RCA)内隐静脉桥血管(SVG-RCA)内的微血管阻塞的潜在可能性。我们招募了有症状的男性稳定型心绞痛患者,其狭窄的右冠状动脉(nRCA)或隐静脉桥血管(SVG-RCA)存在限制血流的狭窄。在支架植入前使用血管内超声分析斑块体积和组成。在支架植入过程中,使用远端闭塞/抽吸装置保护下,从冠状动脉抽吸物中提取出颗粒状碎片和血浆。测量儿茶酚胺、内皮素、血清素、血栓素 B2 和肿瘤坏死因子-α的释放。将有完整内皮(+E)和无内皮(-E)的大鼠肠系膜动脉对抽吸血浆(无选择性内皮素受体阻断和有选择性内皮素受体阻断)的反应归一化为氯化钾(KClmax = 100%)的反应。nRCA 和 SVG-RCA 之间的斑块体积和组成没有差异。nRCA 中的颗粒状碎片较少(65 ± 8 与 146 ± 23 mg;P < 0.05),内皮素释放较多(5.8 ± 0.8 与 1.3 ± 0.7 pg/ml;P < 0.05),而其他介质的释放没有差异。与 SVG-RCA 相比,nRCA 的抽吸物诱导的血管收缩更强[nRCA,78 ± 6%(+E)/84 ± 5%(-E);SVG-RCA,59 ± 6%(+E)/68 ± 3%(-E);P < 0.05 nRCA 与 SVG-RCA],这一作用可被非特异性内皮素和特异性内皮素受体 A 拮抗剂减弱。因此,与 SVG-RCA 相比,支架植入的 nRCA 冠状动脉抽吸物的特征是碎片较少,但内皮素较多,血管收缩反应较强。