Microvascular Research Laboratories, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e68399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068399. Print 2013.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A (VEGF-A) can be generated as multiple isoforms by alternative splicing. Two families of isoforms have been described in humans, pro-angiogenic isoforms typified by VEGF-A165a, and anti-angiogenic isoforms typified by VEGF-A165b. The practical determination of expression levels of alternative isoforms of the same gene may be complicated by experimental protocols that favour one isoform over another, and the use of specific positive and negative controls is essential for the interpretation of findings on expression of the isoforms. Here we address some of the difficulties in experimental design when investigating alternative splicing of VEGF isoforms, and discuss the use of appropriate control paradigms. We demonstrate why use of specific control experiments can prevent assumptions that VEGF-A165b is not present, when in fact it is. We reiterate, and confirm previously published experimental design protocols that demonstrate the importance of using positive controls. These include using known target sequences to show that the experimental conditions are suitable for PCR amplification of VEGF-A165b mRNA for both q-PCR and RT-PCR and to ensure that mispriming does not occur. We also provide evidence that demonstrates that detection of VEGF-A165b protein in mice needs to be tightly controlled to prevent detection of mouse IgG by a secondary antibody. We also show that human VEGF165b protein can be immunoprecipitated from cultured human cells and that immunoprecipitating VEGF-A results in protein that is detected by VEGF-A165b antibody. These findings support the conclusion that more information on the biology of VEGF-A165b isoforms is required, and confirm the importance of the experimental design in such investigations, including the use of specific positive and negative controls.
血管内皮生长因子-A(VEGF-A)可以通过选择性剪接产生多种异构体。在人类中已经描述了两种异构体家族,以 VEGF-A165a 为代表的促血管生成异构体和以 VEGF-A165b 为代表的抗血管生成异构体。同一基因的选择性剪接异构体的表达水平的实际测定可能会受到偏向于一种异构体的实验方案的影响,并且对于异构体表达的结果解释,使用特定的阳性和阴性对照是必不可少的。在这里,我们解决了在研究 VEGF 异构体的选择性剪接时实验设计中的一些困难,并讨论了使用适当的对照方案。我们证明了为什么使用特定的对照实验可以防止假设 VEGF-A165b 不存在,而实际上它是存在的。我们重申并确认了先前发表的实验设计方案,这些方案证明了使用阳性对照的重要性。这些方案包括使用已知的靶序列来证明实验条件是否适合 q-PCR 和 RT-PCR 扩增 VEGF-A165b mRNA,以确保不会发生错误引发。我们还提供了证据,证明在小鼠中检测 VEGF-A165b 蛋白需要严格控制,以防止二级抗体检测到小鼠 IgG。我们还表明,可以从培养的人细胞中免疫沉淀人 VEGF165b 蛋白,并且免疫沉淀 VEGF-A 会导致被 VEGF-A165b 抗体检测到的蛋白。这些发现支持了需要更多关于 VEGF-A165b 异构体生物学信息的结论,并确认了此类研究中实验设计的重要性,包括使用特定的阳性和阴性对照。