• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全数字化乳腺摄影与数字化乳腺断层合成技术后 X 射线诱导 γ-H2AX 焦点的形成。

X-ray induced formation of γ-H2AX foci after full-field digital mammography and digital breast-tomosynthesis.

机构信息

Institute of Radiology, University Erlangen/Nuremberg, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e70660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070660. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0070660
PMID:23936236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3723730/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine in-vivo formation of x-ray induced γ-H2AX foci in systemic blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and to estimate foci after FFDM and digital breast-tomosynthesis (DBT) using a biological phantom model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was performed following approval by the ethic committee of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient. For in-vivo tests, systemic blood lymphocytes were obtained from 20 patients before and after FFDM. In order to compare in-vivo post-exposure with pre-exposure foci levels, the Wilcoxon matched pairs test was used. For in-vitro experiments, isolated blood lymphocytes from healthy volunteers were irradiated at skin and glandular level of a porcine breast using FFDM and DBT. Cells were stained against the phosphorylated histone variant γ-H2AX, and foci representing distinct DNA damages were quantified.

RESULTS

Median in-vivo foci level/cell was 0.086 (range 0.067-0.116) before and 0.094 (0.076-0.126) after FFDM (p = 0.0004). In the in-vitro model, the median x-ray induced foci level/cell after FFDM was 0.120 (range 0.086-0.140) at skin level and 0.035 (range 0.030-0.050) at glandular level. After DBT, the median x-ray induced foci level/cell was 0.061 (range 0.040-0.081) at skin level and 0.015 (range 0.006-0.020) at glandular level.

CONCLUSION

In patients, mammography induces a slight but significant increase of γ-H2AX foci in systemic blood lymphocytes. The introduced biological phantom model is suitable for the estimation of x-ray induced DNA damages in breast tissue in different breast imaging techniques.

摘要

目的

通过使用生物体模模型,在接受全数字化乳腺摄影术(FFDM)的患者的系统血液淋巴细胞中确定体内 X 射线诱导的 γ-H2AX 焦点的形成,并估计 FFDM 和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)后的焦点。

材料和方法

本研究符合赫尔辛基宣言,并在纽伦堡大学伦理委员会的批准下进行。每位患者均获得书面知情同意。对于体内试验,在 FFDM 之前和之后从 20 名患者中获得系统血液淋巴细胞。为了比较暴露后与暴露前的焦点水平,使用 Wilcoxon 配对检验。对于体外实验,使用 FFDM 和 DBT 在猪乳房的皮肤和腺体水平上照射来自健康志愿者的分离血液淋巴细胞。用针对磷酸化组蛋白变体 γ-H2AX 的抗体对细胞进行染色,并定量表示不同 DNA 损伤的焦点。

结果

在体内,FFDM 之前的焦点水平/细胞中位数为 0.086(范围 0.067-0.116),FFDM 之后为 0.094(0.076-0.126)(p = 0.0004)。在体外模型中,FFDM 后 X 射线诱导的焦点水平/细胞中位数为皮肤水平 0.120(范围 0.086-0.140),腺体水平 0.035(范围 0.030-0.050)。DBT 后,X 射线诱导的焦点水平/细胞中位数为皮肤水平 0.061(范围 0.040-0.081),腺体水平 0.015(范围 0.006-0.020)。

结论

在患者中,乳腺摄影术会导致系统血液淋巴细胞中的 γ-H2AX 焦点略有但明显增加。所引入的生物体模模型适用于不同乳腺成像技术中乳腺组织中 X 射线诱导的 DNA 损伤的估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/b955aabc394f/pone.0070660.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/e0e586ce3dd1/pone.0070660.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/53c3b4163c09/pone.0070660.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/935435b10167/pone.0070660.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/b955aabc394f/pone.0070660.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/e0e586ce3dd1/pone.0070660.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/53c3b4163c09/pone.0070660.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/935435b10167/pone.0070660.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5354/3723730/b955aabc394f/pone.0070660.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
X-ray induced formation of γ-H2AX foci after full-field digital mammography and digital breast-tomosynthesis.全数字化乳腺摄影与数字化乳腺断层合成技术后 X 射线诱导 γ-H2AX 焦点的形成。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e70660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070660. Print 2013.
2
Comparison of radiation doses between diagnostic full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a clinical study.诊断全数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)与数字乳腺断层合成(DBT)的辐射剂量比较:一项临床研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2020 Sep;67(3):185-192. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.405. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
3
Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.乳腺 X 线摄影密度估计:使用全自动软件对数字乳腺 X 线摄影和数字乳腺断层合成进行一对一比较。
Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1265-70. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2380-y. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
4
Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.对比二维全视野数字化乳腺摄影(2D FFDM)和三维乳腺断层合成摄影,乳腺增强合成钼靶(CESM)的乳腺辐射剂量
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):362-372. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16743.
5
Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).数字乳腺断层合成摄影(DBT)与全视野数字化乳腺摄影(FFDM)二维合成钼靶的辐射剂量和图像质量的定量分析。
Clin Imaging. 2019 May-Jun;55:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
6
Estimation of percentage breast tissue density: comparison between digital mammography (2D full field digital mammography) and digital breast tomosynthesis according to different BI-RADS categories.乳腺组织密度百分比的估计:数字乳腺钼靶摄影(二维全视野数字化乳腺钼靶摄影)与数字乳腺断层合成技术在不同 BI-RADS 分类中的比较。
Br J Radiol. 2013 Nov;86(1031):20130255. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130255. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
7
Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.使用两种不同数字乳腺X线摄影系统对全视野数字乳腺摄影、数字乳腺断层合成及合成重建二维图像中模拟微钙化的检出率比较
Invest Radiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):206-215. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000334.
8
Factors Affecting Breast Cancer Detectability on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Two-Dimensional Digital Mammography in Patients with Dense Breasts.影响致密型乳腺中数字乳腺断层合成摄影术与二维数字乳腺成像乳腺癌可探测性的因素。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jan;20(1):58-68. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0012. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
9
Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与全数字化乳腺摄影的散射辐射比较。
Invest Radiol. 2015 Oct;50(10):679-85. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000168.
10
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.数字乳腺断层合成术与全视野数字乳腺摄影术:使用标本对病变测量和特征描述准确性的比较
Acta Radiol. 2014 Jul;55(6):661-7. doi: 10.1177/0284185113503636. Epub 2013 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?牙颌面影像学检查的放射生物学风险:我们是否应该担忧?
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Sep 1;50(6):20210153. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210153. Epub 2021 May 14.
2
Radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in peripheral leukocytes and therapeutic response of heel spur patients treated by orthovoltage X-rays or a linear accelerator.外周血白细胞辐射诱导的 DNA 双链断裂与Orthovoltage X 射线或线性加速器治疗跟骨刺患者的治疗反应。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Dec;196(12):1116-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01662-4. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.联合数字乳腺摄影和乳腺断层合成与单独数字乳腺摄影评估放射科医生表现:多中心、多读者试验结果。
Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):104-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120674. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
2
Induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in blood lymphocytes of patients undergoing ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examinations.¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT 检查患者血液淋巴细胞中 DNA 双链断裂的诱导和修复。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Nov;39(11):1712-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2201-1. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
3
手机射频辐射对人类淋巴细胞中的DNA双链断裂(DSB)没有影响。
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(13):272. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.04.35.
4
Analysis of DNA Double-Strand Breaks and Cytotoxicity after 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Isolated Human Lymphocytes.离体人淋巴细胞经7特斯拉磁共振成像后DNA双链断裂及细胞毒性分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132702. eCollection 2015.
Chromosomal instability induced by mammography X-rays in primary human fibroblasts from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
X 射线照射致 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者原代人成纤维细胞染色体不稳定性。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2012 Nov;88(11):846-57. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2012.711500. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
4
DNA damage induced by mammography in high family risk patients: only one single view in screening.乳腺 X 光摄影术在高家族风险患者中诱导的 DNA 损伤:筛查时仅拍摄单次视图。
Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):409-10. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.12.003. Epub 2011 Dec 31.
5
X-ray induced DNA double-strand breaks in coronary CT angiography: comparison of sequential, low-pitch helical and high-pitch helical data acquisition.冠状动脉 CT 血管造影中的 X 射线诱导的 DNA 双链断裂:连续、低螺距螺旋和高螺距螺旋数据采集的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):e357-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.027. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
6
DNA double-strand breaks induced by mammographic screening procedures in human mammary epithelial cells.乳腺 X 线筛查程序诱导人乳腺上皮细胞中的 DNA 双链断裂。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2011 Nov;87(11):1103-12. doi: 10.3109/09553002.2011.608410. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
7
Irradiation induced foci (IRIF) as a biomarker for radiosensitivity.辐射诱导焦点(IRIF)作为放射敏感性的生物标志物。
Mutat Res. 2012 Aug 1;736(1-2):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.05.017. Epub 2011 May 30.
8
Accumulation of DNA damage in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells during human aging.人类衰老过程中造血干细胞和祖细胞内 DNA 损伤的积累。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 7;6(3):e17487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017487.
9
Phase-contrast X-ray imaging of breast.乳腺的相衬X射线成像
Acta Radiol. 2010 Oct;51(8):866-84. doi: 10.3109/02841851.2010.504742.
10
Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.乳腺影像学研究的辐射剂量与癌症风险。
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):246-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100570. Epub 2010 Aug 24.