• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于取出膀胱内打结导管的简易技术:经皮耻骨上膀胱镜干预。

An easy technique for removal of knotted catheter in the bladder: percutaneous suprapubic cystoscopic intervention.

作者信息

Ozkan Aybars, Okur Mesut, Kaya Murat, Büyükkaya Ramazan, Katranci Ali Osman, Kucuk Adem

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Duzce Duzce, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013 Aug 1;6(7):603-5. Print 2013.

PMID:23936602
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3731195/
Abstract

Uncontaminated urine samples are indispensable to precisely diagnose urinary tract infections in new-borns or infants. Among many clinical interventions for urine collection are described, the most common noninvasive practice is using sterile bags, associated with significant contamination of samples. In children, however, invasive methods i.e. catheterization, are generally needed for reliable urine specimens. Almost always all the inserted catheters are easily drawn back, nevertheless, might not work as expected, and lead to considerable problems that cannot be overcome. Herein, a case of a female newborn treated with a successful percutaneous suprapubic cystoscopic procedure for extracting knotted urinary catheter in the bladder is presented. The least invasive and easiest technic is suggested to be used when catheter is knotted in the bladder, as elaborately stated.

摘要

未受污染的尿液样本对于准确诊断新生儿或婴儿的尿路感染至关重要。在描述的多种尿液采集临床干预措施中,最常见的非侵入性做法是使用无菌袋,但这会导致样本受到严重污染。然而,对于儿童而言,通常需要采用侵入性方法,即导尿术来获取可靠的尿液标本。几乎所有插入的导管都能轻松拔出,不过,可能无法达到预期效果,并导致一些无法克服的重大问题。在此,本文介绍了一例通过经皮耻骨上膀胱镜检查成功取出膀胱内打结导尿管的女婴病例。文中详细说明,当导尿管在膀胱内打结时,建议采用侵入性最小且最简单的技术。

相似文献

1
An easy technique for removal of knotted catheter in the bladder: percutaneous suprapubic cystoscopic intervention.一种用于取出膀胱内打结导管的简易技术:经皮耻骨上膀胱镜干预。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013 Aug 1;6(7):603-5. Print 2013.
2
3
Suprapubic bladder aspiration versus urethral catheterization in ill infants: success, efficiency and complication rates.患病婴儿耻骨上膀胱穿刺抽吸术与尿道插管术的成功率、效率及并发症发生率比较
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Feb;23(2):225-30. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70035-4.
4
Pain in infants who are younger than 2 months during suprapubic aspiration and transurethral bladder catheterization: a randomized, controlled study.2个月以下婴儿耻骨上穿刺抽吸术和经尿道膀胱插管术期间的疼痛:一项随机对照研究。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e51-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2326.
5
Evaluation of bladder stimulation as a non-invasive technique for urine collection to diagnose urinary tract infection in infants under 6 months: a randomized multicenter study ("EE-Sti.Ve.N").评估膀胱刺激作为一种非侵入性尿液采集技术用于诊断6个月以下婴儿尿路感染的研究:一项随机多中心研究(“EE-Sti.Ve.N”)
Trials. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3914-2.
6
Suprapubic Percutaneous Assisted Cystoscopic Excision of Posterior Urethral Fibroepithelial Polyps in Pediatric Patients.经耻骨上辅助膀胱镜切除小儿后尿道纤维上皮息肉。
Urol J. 2020 Aug 11;18(1):86-91. doi: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5688.
7
Long-term bladder drainage: Suprapubic catheter versus other methods: a scoping review.长期膀胱引流:耻骨上导管与其他方法比较:范围综述。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):944-51. doi: 10.1002/nau.22356. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
8
Cystoscopy-assisted percutaneous removal of impacted urethral stone: a case report.膀胱镜辅助经皮取出嵌顿性尿道结石:一例报告
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Mar;22(2):189-91. doi: 10.1089/lap.2011.0120. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
9
The Knotted Urethral Catheter-Description of a Novel Technique and Steps for Removal.《带结的尿道导尿管——一种新的取出技术描述及步骤》。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 Feb 1;40(2):166-168. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003129.
10
Suprapubic bladder drainage and epidural catheters following abdominal surgery-A risk for urinary tract infections?耻骨上膀胱引流和腹部手术后的硬膜外导管——尿路感染的风险?
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0209825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209825. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Spontaneous knotting of urinary catheters placed with nonindwelling intent: Case series and literature review.非留置目的放置的导尿管自发打结:病例系列及文献综述
Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):443-446. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_15_19.
2
Common genitourinary catheters: a systematic approach for the radiologist.常见的泌尿生殖系统导管:放射科医生的系统方法。
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Aug;48(8):1155-1166. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4148-2. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Knotted urethral catheter: an unusual complication in adults.打结的尿道导管:成人中的一种罕见并发症。
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Oct 10;2017:bcr-2017-221498. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221498.
4
Knotted urethral catheter: a twist in the tail.打结的尿道导管:尾巴上的一个扭转。
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 May 3;2017:bcr-2016-217834. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-217834.

本文引用的文献

1
Spontaneous intravesical knotting of urethral catheter.尿道导管自发性膀胱内打结
APSP J Case Rep. 2011 Sep;2(3):21. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
2
eComment: double-knotted Swan-Ganz catheter--potential for non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring?电子评论:双结 Swan-Ganz 导管——无创超声心输出量监测的潜力?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;7(5):862-3. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2008.181339A.
3
Urethral catheter knotting: Be aware and minimize the risk.尿道导管打结:提高警惕并尽量降低风险。
CJEM. 2002 Mar;4(2):108-10. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500006229.
4
Spontaneous knotting of urinary catheters: clinical and experimental observations.导尿管的自发打结:临床与实验观察
Urol Int. 2006;77(4):317-21. doi: 10.1159/000096335.
5
Suprapubic catheter knotting: an unusual complication.耻骨上导管打结:一种罕见的并发症。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2004;36(4):537-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-004-0862-9.
6
Does the use of volumetric bladder ultrasound improve the success rate of suprapubic aspiration of urine?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002 Oct;18(5):346-9. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200210000-00004.
7
Insertion of indwelling urethral catheters in infants and children: a survey of current nursing practice.婴儿及儿童留置导尿管的插入:当前护理实践调查
Pediatr Nurs. 1998 May-Jun;24(3):229-34.
8
Standards to prevent complications of urinary catheterization in children: should and should-knots.
J Soc Pediatr Nurs. 1997 Jan-Mar;2(1):37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.1997.tb00198.x.