University Hospital Würzburg, Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, Würzburg, Germany.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Core Unit Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, Würzburg, Germany.
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 23;14(1):e0209825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209825. eCollection 2019.
Epidural catheters are state of the art for postoperative analgesic in abdominal surgery. Due to neurolysis it can lead to postoperative urinary tract retention (POUR), which leads to prolonged bladder catheterization, which has an increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). Our aim was to identify the current perioperative management of urinary catheters and, second, to identify the optimal time of suprapubic bladder catheter removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter.
We sent a questionnaire to 102 German hospitals and analyzed the 83 received answers to evaluate the current handling of bladder drainage and epidural catheters. Then, we conducted a retrospective study including 501 patients, who received an epidural and suprapubic catheter after abdominal surgery at the University Hospital Würzburg. We divided the patients into three groups according to the point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter and analyzed the onset of a UTI.
Our survey showed that in almost all hospitals (98.8%), patients received an epidural catheter and a bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. The point in time of urinary catheter removal was equally distributed between before, simultaneously and after the removal of the epidural catheter (respectively: ~28-29%). The retrospective study showed a catheter-associated UTI in 6.7%. Women were affected significantly more often than men (10,7% versus 2,5%, p<0.001). There was a non-significant trend to more UTIs when the suprapubic catheter was removed after the epidural catheter (before: 5.7%, after: 8.4%).
The point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in relation to the removal of the epidural catheter does not seem to correlate with the rate of UTIs. The current handling in Germany is inhomogeneous, so further studies to standardize treatment are recommended.
硬膜外导管是腹部手术后镇痛的最新技术。由于神经松解术,它可能导致术后尿潴留(POUR),从而导致膀胱导尿时间延长,增加尿路感染(UTI)的风险。我们的目的是确定当前围手术期导尿管管理方法,并确定与硬膜外导管去除相关的耻骨上膀胱导管去除的最佳时间。
我们向 102 家德国医院发送了一份问卷,并对收到的 83 份答案进行了分析,以评估当前膀胱引流和硬膜外导管的处理情况。然后,我们进行了一项回顾性研究,包括在维尔茨堡大学医院接受腹部手术后接受硬膜外和耻骨上导管的 501 名患者。我们根据耻骨上膀胱引流去除与硬膜外导管去除的时间点将患者分为三组,并分析 UTI 的发生情况。
我们的调查显示,几乎所有医院(98.8%)在腹部手术后都会给患者使用硬膜外导管和膀胱引流。导尿管去除的时间点在硬膜外导管去除之前、同时和之后同样分布(分别为:~28-29%)。回顾性研究显示,导管相关尿路感染发生率为 6.7%。女性受影响的比例明显高于男性(10.7%比 2.5%,p<0.001)。当耻骨上导管在硬膜外导管之后去除时,UTI 的发生率有非显著趋势(前:5.7%,后:8.4%)。
耻骨上膀胱引流去除与硬膜外导管去除的时间点似乎与 UTI 的发生率无关。德国目前的处理方法不一致,因此建议进一步研究以规范治疗。