Suppr超能文献

口服曲马多缓释片治疗日本和韩国中重度慢性恶性肿瘤相关疼痛患者的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of oral tapentadol extended release in Japanese and Korean patients with moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain.

机构信息

Janssen Japan , Tokyo , Japan.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Oct;29(10):1399-409. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.831816. Epub 2013 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapentadol extended release (ER) compared with oxycodone controlled release (CR) for the management of moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related cancer pain.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study included Japanese and Korean patients with moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive oral tapentadol ER (25-200 mg bid) or oral oxycodone HCl CR (5-40 mg bid) for 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01165281.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

This study was designed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the efficacy provided by tapentadol ER versus oxycodone CR, based on the mean change in average pain intensity (11 point numerical rating scale) from baseline to the last 3 days of study drug administration. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Of the 374 patients who were screened, 343 were randomized and 236 completed treatment. The least-squares mean difference in the change in pain intensity from baseline to the last 3 days of study treatment between tapentadol ER and oxycodone CR was -0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.506 to 0.383). The upper limit of the 95% CI was <1 (the predefined threshold value for non-inferiority), indicating that tapentadol ER provided analgesic efficacy that was non-inferior to that of oxycodone CR. The percentage of patients reporting at least one TEAE was similar in the tapentadol ER (87.5% [147/168]) and oxycodone CR (90.1% [155/172]) treatment groups, but the incidence of gastrointestinal TEAEs was lower in the tapentadol ER group (55.4% [93/168]) than in the oxycodone CR group (67.4% [116/172]).

CONCLUSIONS

Tapentadol ER (25-200 mg bid) provides analgesic efficacy that is non-inferior to that provided by oxycodone HCl CR (5-40 mg bid) for the management of moderate to severe, chronic malignant tumor-related pain, and is well tolerated overall, with a better gastrointestinal tolerability profile than oxycodone CR.

摘要

目的

这项 3 期研究评估了与盐酸羟考酮控释片(CR)相比,酒石酸氢可酮控释片(ER)用于治疗中重度慢性恶性肿瘤相关癌痛的疗效和安全性。

研究设计和方法

本研究为随机、双盲、阳性药物对照研究,纳入了日本和韩国的中重度慢性恶性肿瘤相关疼痛患者。患者随机(1:1)接受酒石酸氢可酮 ER(25-200mg,bid)或盐酸羟考酮 CR(5-40mg,bid)治疗,为期 4 周的双盲治疗。临床试验注册号:NCT01165281。

主要观察指标

本研究旨在评估酒石酸氢可酮 ER 与盐酸羟考酮 CR 的疗效非劣效性,主要观察指标为从基线到研究药物治疗最后 3 天平均疼痛强度(11 点数字评分量表)的变化。记录整个研究过程中的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。

结果

在 374 例筛选患者中,343 例患者被随机分组,236 例患者完成了治疗。酒石酸氢可酮 ER 和盐酸羟考酮 CR 治疗组从基线到研究药物治疗最后 3 天疼痛强度变化的最小二乘均数差值为-0.06(95%置信区间[-0.506,0.383])。95%置信区间的上限<1(非劣效性的预设阈值),表明酒石酸氢可酮 ER 的镇痛疗效不劣于盐酸羟考酮 CR。酒石酸氢可酮 ER 治疗组(87.5%[147/168])和盐酸羟考酮 CR 治疗组(90.1%[155/172])报告至少 1 例 TEAEs 的患者比例相似,但酒石酸氢可酮 ER 组胃肠道 TEAEs 的发生率(55.4%[93/168])低于盐酸羟考酮 CR 组(67.4%[116/172])。

结论

酒石酸氢可酮 ER(25-200mg,bid)用于治疗中重度慢性恶性肿瘤相关疼痛的疗效不劣于盐酸羟考酮 CR(5-40mg,bid),总体耐受良好,胃肠道耐受性优于盐酸羟考酮 CR。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验