Suppr超能文献

语言可以将原本不可见的物体提升到视觉意识中。

Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14196-201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303312110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

Linguistic labels (e.g., "chair") seem to activate visual properties of the objects to which they refer. Here we investigated whether language-based activation of visual representations can affect the ability to simply detect the presence of an object. We used continuous flash suppression to suppress visual awareness of familiar objects while they were continuously presented to one eye. Participants made simple detection decisions, indicating whether they saw any image. Hearing a verbal label before the simple detection task changed performance relative to an uninformative cue baseline. Valid labels improved performance relative to no-label baseline trials. Invalid labels decreased performance. Labels affected both sensitivity (d') and response times. In addition, we found that the effectiveness of labels varied predictably as a function of the match between the shape of the stimulus and the shape denoted by the label. Together, the findings suggest that facilitated detection of invisible objects due to language occurs at a perceptual rather than semantic locus. We hypothesize that when information associated with verbal labels matches stimulus-driven activity, language can provide a boost to perception, propelling an otherwise invisible image into awareness.

摘要

语言标签(例如“椅子”)似乎激活了它们所指对象的视觉属性。在这里,我们研究了基于语言的视觉表示的激活是否会影响简单检测物体存在的能力。我们使用连续闪光抑制来抑制熟悉物体的视觉意识,同时将它们连续呈现给一只眼睛。参与者进行简单的检测决策,表明他们是否看到任何图像。在简单检测任务之前听到口头标签会改变相对于无信息提示基线的性能。有效标签相对于无标签基线试验提高了性能。无效标签降低了性能。标签影响了敏感性(d')和反应时间。此外,我们发现标签的有效性可以根据刺激形状与标签所表示的形状之间的匹配程度进行预测。总之,这些发现表明,由于语言而导致的不可见物体的检测变得更容易是在知觉层面上,而不是语义层面上。我们假设,当与口头标签相关的信息与刺激驱动的活动匹配时,语言可以为感知提供助力,将原本不可见的图像推向意识。

相似文献

1
Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):14196-201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303312110. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Colour Terms Affect Detection of Colour and Colour-Associated Objects Suppressed from Visual Awareness.
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 29;11(3):e0152212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152212. eCollection 2016.
3
Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2236-53. doi: 10.3758/bf03196698.
4
Making the invisible visible: verbal but not visual cues enhance visual detection.
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 7;5(7):e11452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011452.
5
No matter how: Top-down effects of verbal and semantic category knowledge on early visual perception.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Aug;19(4):859-876. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00679-8.
6
Unpredictive linguistic verbal cues accelerate congruent visual targets into awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):2102-2112. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02297-y. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
Words Jump-Start Vision: A Label Advantage in Object Recognition.
J Neurosci. 2015 Jun 24;35(25):9329-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5111-14.2015.
8
Content-specific expectations enhance stimulus detectability by increasing perceptual sensitivity.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):1089-104. doi: 10.1037/xge0000109. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Object individuation and labelling in 6-month-old infants.
Infant Behav Dev. 2021 Nov;65:101627. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101627. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Verbal labels modulate perceptual object processing in 1-year-old children.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Dec;22(12):2781-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21427.

引用本文的文献

1
Unaware processing of words activates experience-derived information in conceptual-semantic brain networks.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 26;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00484. eCollection 2025.
2
Semantic influences on object detection: Drift diffusion modeling provides insights regarding mechanism.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jun 11;21(6):e1012269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012269. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Spoken words affect visual object recognition via the modulation of alpha and beta oscillations.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Apr 14;19:1467249. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1467249. eCollection 2025.
4
Words before pictures: the role of language in biasing visual attention.
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1439397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1439397. eCollection 2024.
5
Emotional concepts shape the perceptual representation of body expressions.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 15;45(12):e26789. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26789.
6
The label-feedback effect is influenced by target category in visual search.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0306736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306736. eCollection 2024.
7
The temporal dynamics of conscious and unconscious audio-visual semantic integration.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 27;10(13):e33828. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33828. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
8
Priors and prejudice: hierarchical predictive processing in intergroup perception.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 13;15:1386370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386370. eCollection 2024.
10
Conceptual Associations Generate Sensory Predictions.
J Neurosci. 2023 May 17;43(20):3733-3742. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1874-22.2023. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000477. Epub 2013 May 10.
2
Self-directed speech affects visual search performance.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1068-85. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.647039. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
3
The effect of language on visual contrast sensitivity.
Perception. 2011;40(12):1402-12. doi: 10.1068/p7010.
4
Linguistically modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis.
Front Psychol. 2012 Mar 8;3:54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00054. eCollection 2012.
5
Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.
J Vis. 2012 Mar 8;12(3):8. doi: 10.1167/12.3.8.
6
Object-based attention occurs regardless of object awareness.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Apr;19(2):225-31. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0207-5.
7
Late vision: processes and epistemic status.
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 16;2:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00382. eCollection 2011.
8
Semantic analysis does not occur in the absence of awareness induced by interocular suppression.
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13535-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1691-11.2011.
9
Pop-out without awareness: unseen feature singletons capture attention only when top-down attention is available.
Psychol Sci. 2011 Sep;22(9):1220-6. doi: 10.1177/0956797611419302. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Recurrent processing in V1/V2 contributes to categorization of natural scenes.
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2488-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3074-10.2011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验